EU Integration and Judicial Reform: Cross-Country Lessons drawn from the Romanian and Albanian Perspectives

Romania and Albania, both former communist countries, have pursued European integration as a strategic goal to enhance democratic reforms and boost economic development. Romania joined the EU in 2007, while Albania became an EU candidate country in 2014, and is slowly advancing towards EU accession. Their shared history of authoritarianism and transition highlights the opportunities and challenges encountered while aligning with EU standards. Based on a comparative study, this research aims to present the most prominent criterion for EU accession, that of a consolidated judiciary, from the perspectives of an EU Member State and an EU candidate country respectively. Could the standards of the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) – instituted for Romania and Bulgaria, at the time of their EU accession and formally closed in September 2023 – inspire reform criteria for the admission of EU’s candidate countries? The analysis seeks to identify arguments that could seriously influence Albania’s judicial reform. Moreover, it aims to broaden EU’s outlook on reform strategies applicable to other Western Balkan countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Government, Law, and Information Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU Integration and Judicial Reform: Cross-Country Lessons drawn from the Romanian and Albanian Perspectives

Gelanda Shkurtaj
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Government, Law, and Information Management
article

EU Integration and Judicial Reform: Cross-Country Lessons drawn from the Romanian and Albanian Perspectives

Gelanda Shkurtaj
article en

Abstract

Romania and Albania, both former communist countries, have pursued European integration as a strategic goal to enhance democratic reforms and boost economic development. Romania joined the EU in 2007, while Albania became an EU candidate country in 2014, and is slowly advancing towards EU accession. Their shared history of authoritarianism and transition highlights the opportunities and challenges encountered while aligning with EU standards. Based on a comparative study, this research aims to present the most prominent criterion for EU accession, that of a consolidated judiciary, from the perspectives of an EU Member State and an EU candidate country respectively. Could the standards of the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) – instituted for Romania and Bulgaria, at the time of their EU accession and formally closed in September 2023 – inspire reform criteria for the admission of EU’s candidate countries? The analysis seeks to identify arguments that could seriously influence Albania’s judicial reform. Moreover, it aims to broaden EU’s outlook on reform strategies applicable to other Western Balkan countries.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Epoka University (AL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Government, Law, and Information Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EU Integration and Judicial Reform: Cross-Country Lessons drawn from the Romanian and Albanian Perspectives — Gelanda Shkurtaj · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS