Enhanced recovery pathways reduce length of stay and improve outcomes in hip and knee arthroplasty

Aim: <br/>To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols with standard care for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. <br/><br/>Design: <br/>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. <br/><br/>Method: <br/>A comprehensive search of four databases identified RCTs comparing enhanced <br/>recovery pathways with standard care in hip and knee arthroplasty. Primary outcome was length of stay, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported outcomes, functional measures, and complications. Assessment of methodological quality was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Narrative and tabular synthesis was utilised for all individual studies and comparisons between ERAS and standard care pathways were grouped and reported on. <br/><br/>Results: <br/>Five RCTs (710 patients) met inclusion criteria. ERAS pathways reduced length of by an average of 4.7 days compared to standard care. Patients in ERAS protocols <br/>demonstrated superior early functional recovery, particularly in the first postoperative week, with improved performance in mobility tests and daily activities. Patient-reported outcomes generally favored ERAS protocols, though measurement heterogeneity limited synthesis. No studies reported increased complications with ERAS implementation. <br/><br/>Conclusion: <br/>ERAS pathways significantly reduce length of stay following primary hip and knee arthroplasty while improving early functional recovery and without compromising patient safety. While early functional benefits were evident, standardisation of outcome measures is needed to improve comparability across studies. <br/><br/>Key practice points <br/>• Enhanced recovery pathways reduce hospital length of stay without increasing <br/>complications. <br/>• Early postoperative mobility and function are improved with enhanced recovery. <br/>• Further research is needed to refine protocols and standardise outcome <br/>measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Published
2025-10-24
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced recovery pathways reduce length of stay and improve outcomes in hip and knee arthroplasty

Elizabeth Puze, William Talbot, Kendal Sands
Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Enhanced recovery pathways reduce length of stay and improve outcomes in hip and knee arthroplasty

Elizabeth Puze, William Talbot, Kendal Sands
article en

Abstract

Aim: <br/>To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols with standard care for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. <br/><br/>Design: <br/>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. <br/><br/>Method: <br/>A comprehensive search of four databases identified RCTs comparing enhanced <br/>recovery pathways with standard care in hip and knee arthroplasty. Primary outcome was length of stay, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported outcomes, functional measures, and complications. Assessment of methodological quality was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Narrative and tabular synthesis was utilised for all individual studies and comparisons between ERAS and standard care pathways were grouped and reported on. <br/><br/>Results: <br/>Five RCTs (710 patients) met inclusion criteria. ERAS pathways reduced length of by an average of 4.7 days compared to standard care. Patients in ERAS protocols <br/>demonstrated superior early functional recovery, particularly in the first postoperative week, with improved performance in mobility tests and daily activities. Patient-reported outcomes generally favored ERAS protocols, though measurement heterogeneity limited synthesis. No studies reported increased complications with ERAS implementation. <br/><br/>Conclusion: <br/>ERAS pathways significantly reduce length of stay following primary hip and knee arthroplasty while improving early functional recovery and without compromising patient safety. While early functional benefits were evident, standardisation of outcome measures is needed to improve comparability across studies. <br/><br/>Key practice points <br/>• Enhanced recovery pathways reduce hospital length of stay without increasing <br/>complications. <br/>• Early postoperative mobility and function are improved with enhanced recovery. <br/>• Further research is needed to refine protocols and standardise outcome <br/>measures.

Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Gold Coast Hospital (AU), OR Concepts Applied (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.