Do AI applications compromise ethics and integrity in facilities management? Insights from the UK

Background and aim: AI applications are increasingly being utilised in facilities management (FM) for functions such as operational management, energy management and maintenance management. However, a larger part of the industry would rather use contemporary methods due to ethical and integrity concerns associated with AI applications. Hence, this study attempts to answer the question: Do AI applications compromise ethics and integrity in FM? Methods: This is a qualitative study. As the research method, in-depth interviews are selected. FM professionals possessing relevant knowledge and experience in the UK have been chosen as experts. Thematic analysis has been adopted to analyse data. As this is ongoing research, preliminary findings obtained from the interview series are presented in this paper. Results: Findings reveal that ethics and integrity can be compromised if the required security measures are not implemented within the systems and strategies in FM organisations. A framework has been developed to explain ethical AI adoption in FM, recommending alignment with GDPR and ISO standards. Originality: Although several studies have been carried out exploring the use of AI applications in FM functions and have identified the issue of compromised ethics and integrity, only a few studies have focused on FM organisations and discussed FM-specific solutions. Hence, this study addresses a substantial research gap in FM. Practical or societal implications: This study will motivate FM professionals to adopt AI applications with confidence and contribute to sustainable transformation in FM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do AI applications compromise ethics and integrity in facilities management? Insights from the UK

Kalani C. Dahanayake, Nipuni Sumanarathna, Aravinda Adhikari
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Do AI applications compromise ethics and integrity in facilities management? Insights from the UK

Kalani C. Dahanayake, Nipuni Sumanarathna, Aravinda Adhikari
article en

Abstract

Background and aim: AI applications are increasingly being utilised in facilities management (FM) for functions such as operational management, energy management and maintenance management. However, a larger part of the industry would rather use contemporary methods due to ethical and integrity concerns associated with AI applications. Hence, this study attempts to answer the question: Do AI applications compromise ethics and integrity in FM? Methods: This is a qualitative study. As the research method, in-depth interviews are selected. FM professionals possessing relevant knowledge and experience in the UK have been chosen as experts. Thematic analysis has been adopted to analyse data. As this is ongoing research, preliminary findings obtained from the interview series are presented in this paper. Results: Findings reveal that ethics and integrity can be compromised if the required security measures are not implemented within the systems and strategies in FM organisations. A framework has been developed to explain ethical AI adoption in FM, recommending alignment with GDPR and ISO standards. Originality: Although several studies have been carried out exploring the use of AI applications in FM functions and have identified the issue of compromised ethics and integrity, only a few studies have focused on FM organisations and discussed FM-specific solutions. Hence, this study addresses a substantial research gap in FM. Practical or societal implications: This study will motivate FM professionals to adopt AI applications with confidence and contribute to sustainable transformation in FM.

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.