Comparative analysis of Investment Cast Inconel 625 with Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing

Background: Inconel 625, renowned for its remarkable resistance to high-temperature and corrosive environments, serves as a pivotal superalloy in industries with stringent performance demands. Objectives: This study presents a comparative analysis of Inconel 625 components produced via two distinct methods: atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM) and investment casting (IC). The primary objective of this research is to assess the physical and mechanical properties of samples fabricated through both ADAM and IC. Methods: Mechanical properits including tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation as well as surface quality of the parts are evaluated . A quantitative and insightful comparison between ADAM and IC, offer shedding light on their respective performance in meeting the mechanical requirements of industrial applications. Results: The findings indicate that Inconel 625 components produced via ADAM exhibit comparable mechanical properties, with an ultimate tensile strength of 652MPa, yield strength 298MPa, elongation 42% and hardness of 7HRC. In comparison, Inconel 625 components produced through IC exhibit an ultimate tensile strength of 495MPa, yield strength 283MPa, elongation19%. and hardness of 20HRC. This direct comparison underscores the comparable mechanical properties achieved through ADAM. Conclusion: Beyond the analysis of mechanical properties, this study highlights the practical advantages of ADAM, which offers unparalleled design flexibility, significantly reduces material waste, and enables the creation of intricate geometries tailored to the specific needs of diverse industries. These advantages position ADAM as an optimal choice for industries seeking, design flexibility, light-weighting and fast production.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)
Published
2024-10-07
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of Investment Cast Inconel 625 with Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing

Nida Naveed, Mark Armstrong, Hamid Ahmad Mehrabi
Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Comparative analysis of Investment Cast Inconel 625 with Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing

Nida Naveed, Mark Armstrong, Hamid Ahmad Mehrabi
article en

Abstract

Background: Inconel 625, renowned for its remarkable resistance to high-temperature and corrosive environments, serves as a pivotal superalloy in industries with stringent performance demands. Objectives: This study presents a comparative analysis of Inconel 625 components produced via two distinct methods: atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM) and investment casting (IC). The primary objective of this research is to assess the physical and mechanical properties of samples fabricated through both ADAM and IC. Methods: Mechanical properits including tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation as well as surface quality of the parts are evaluated . A quantitative and insightful comparison between ADAM and IC, offer shedding light on their respective performance in meeting the mechanical requirements of industrial applications. Results: The findings indicate that Inconel 625 components produced via ADAM exhibit comparable mechanical properties, with an ultimate tensile strength of 652MPa, yield strength 298MPa, elongation 42% and hardness of 7HRC. In comparison, Inconel 625 components produced through IC exhibit an ultimate tensile strength of 495MPa, yield strength 283MPa, elongation19%. and hardness of 20HRC. This direct comparison underscores the comparable mechanical properties achieved through ADAM. Conclusion: Beyond the analysis of mechanical properties, this study highlights the practical advantages of ADAM, which offers unparalleled design flexibility, significantly reduces material waste, and enables the creation of intricate geometries tailored to the specific needs of diverse industries. These advantages position ADAM as an optimal choice for industries seeking, design flexibility, light-weighting and fast production.

Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of Investment Cast Inconel 625 with Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing — Nida Naveed, Mark Armstrong, et al. · Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS