When (your) inclusion is part of your job: exploring “professional” disability advocacy

Purpose The article explores two types of professional disability advocacy at work by employees with disabilities: (1) being an official disability representative and (2) being a disability inclusion specialist. Design/methodology/approach We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to explore common and distinct themes of disability advocacy between representatives and inclusion specialists. Findings We find that both groups differed, especially regarding the form and impact of their advocacy. Representatives emphasized networking and internal advocacy. Inclusion specialists were more concerned with their role model function and their impact for person with disabilities outside their organizations. Originality/value The analysis of different roles of disability advocacy within organizations has only been partially explored. In particular, research on the role of disability representatives, i.e., employees legally mandated (and elected) to represent disability issues at work, is scarce. We have taken a step to illuminate this aspect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-11-2024-0564
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When (your) inclusion is part of your job: exploring “professional” disability advocacy

Louisa Antonia Riess, Christoph Breier
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Disability Education and Employment
article

When (your) inclusion is part of your job: exploring “professional” disability advocacy

Louisa Antonia Riess, Christoph Breier
article en

Abstract

Purpose The article explores two types of professional disability advocacy at work by employees with disabilities: (1) being an official disability representative and (2) being a disability inclusion specialist. Design/methodology/approach We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to explore common and distinct themes of disability advocacy between representatives and inclusion specialists. Findings We find that both groups differed, especially regarding the form and impact of their advocacy. Representatives emphasized networking and internal advocacy. Inclusion specialists were more concerned with their role model function and their impact for person with disabilities outside their organizations. Originality/value The analysis of different roles of disability advocacy within organizations has only been partially explored. In particular, research on the role of disability representatives, i.e., employees legally mandated (and elected) to represent disability issues at work, is scarce. We have taken a step to illuminate this aspect.

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Office of Diversity and Inclusion (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.