No Compensation for Non-pecuniary Damage to a Legal Person – Estonian Example

The authors of this article explore whether legal persons should be entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage under Estonian law. Although current Estonian jurisprudence generally denies such claims, arguing that legal persons cannot experience pain or emotional suffering, the authors challenge this narrow interpretation. Through analysis of Estonian legal norms, comparative European jurisprudence, and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the article argues that legal persons may still suffer reputational harm that warrants legal redress. The paper proposes a re-evaluation of Estonian tort law to allow compensation for non-pecuniary damage in specific situations, especially where reputational damage compromises a legal person’s ability to function effectively. Recognizing legal persons as holders of personal or quasi-personal rights could provide a more robust and equitable legal framework, in line with evolving European legal standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.19.01
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Compensation for Non-pecuniary Damage to a Legal Person – Estonian Example

Janno Lahe, Irene Kull, Andres Vutt
JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW
European and International Contract Law
article

No Compensation for Non-pecuniary Damage to a Legal Person – Estonian Example

Janno Lahe, Irene Kull, Andres Vutt
article en

Abstract

The authors of this article explore whether legal persons should be entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage under Estonian law. Although current Estonian jurisprudence generally denies such claims, arguing that legal persons cannot experience pain or emotional suffering, the authors challenge this narrow interpretation. Through analysis of Estonian legal norms, comparative European jurisprudence, and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the article argues that legal persons may still suffer reputational harm that warrants legal redress. The paper proposes a re-evaluation of Estonian tort law to allow compensation for non-pecuniary damage in specific situations, especially where reputational damage compromises a legal person’s ability to function effectively. Recognizing legal persons as holders of personal or quasi-personal rights could provide a more robust and equitable legal framework, in line with evolving European legal standards.

JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW(19)
University of Tartu (EE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.