Simulated loading and unloading of pigs of two slaughter weights: effects of the group size on their ease of handling and physiological response

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of handling barrows of two slaughter weights, light (L: 135.1 kg average final weight) and heavy (H: 152.9 kg average final weight), and group sizes (3 vs. 6 pigs/group) through a simulated loading and unloading procedure on their behavioural and physiological response. Behaviour was observed in 120 pigs, while heart rate (HR) and whole blood lactate concentrations were evaluated in a subsample of 81 pigs (3 pigs/group). The interaction body weight × group size had no effect on handler interventions, pig behaviours, and post-handling blood lactate concentration. Handling time was longer in H pigs ( P = 0.05), but the number of handler interventions and paddle noise was greater only in larger groups of pigs ( P ≤ 0.05), resulting from their higher frequency of turning back, backing-up, and going backward ( P = 0.04, P = 0.02, and P = 0.04, respectively). Pigs handled in larger groups presented greater post-handling blood lactate concentrations ( P < 0.01). In L pigs, the HR increased more when handled in smaller than larger groups ( P = 0.03) without significant consequences during the recovery period. Our results suggest that a smaller group size would reduce pigs’ fatigue and ease their handling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2025-0073
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulated loading and unloading of pigs of two slaughter weights: effects of the group size on their ease of handling and physiological response

Nicolas Devillers, Ana Maria Bridi, Aloma Zoratti, Edi. Piasentier et al.
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Simulated loading and unloading of pigs of two slaughter weights: effects of the group size on their ease of handling and physiological response

Nicolas Devillers, Ana Maria Bridi, Aloma Zoratti, Edi. Piasentier, Jéssica Gonçalves Vero, Luigi Faucitano, Sabine Conte, Kyle A. T. Moak
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of handling barrows of two slaughter weights, light (L: 135.1 kg average final weight) and heavy (H: 152.9 kg average final weight), and group sizes (3 vs. 6 pigs/group) through a simulated loading and unloading procedure on their behavioural and physiological response. Behaviour was observed in 120 pigs, while heart rate (HR) and whole blood lactate concentrations were evaluated in a subsample of 81 pigs (3 pigs/group). The interaction body weight × group size had no effect on handler interventions, pig behaviours, and post-handling blood lactate concentration. Handling time was longer in H pigs ( P = 0.05), but the number of handler interventions and paddle noise was greater only in larger groups of pigs ( P ≤ 0.05), resulting from their higher frequency of turning back, backing-up, and going backward ( P = 0.04, P = 0.02, and P = 0.04, respectively). Pigs handled in larger groups presented greater post-handling blood lactate concentrations ( P < 0.01). In L pigs, the HR increased more when handled in smaller than larger groups ( P = 0.03) without significant consequences during the recovery period. Our results suggest that a smaller group size would reduce pigs’ fatigue and ease their handling.

Canadian Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 106
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), University of Udine (IT), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Simulated loading and unloading of pigs of two slaughter weights: effects of the group size on their ease of handling and physiological response — Nicolas Devillers, Ana Maria Bridi, et al. · Canadian Journal of Animal Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS