Exploring Contextual and Behavioral Determinants of Environmental Auditing Adoption

This study's primary objective is to identify the determinants of environmental auditing (EA) adoption intention in environmentally sensitive industries. Its novelty lies in developing and testing an integrated model that extends the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by incorporating four contextual factors: Coercive Pressure, Stakeholder Pressure, Internal Resources, and Corporate Culture. For its methodology, the research analyzed survey data from 336 senior managers using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The findings confirm that the three core TPB constructs - Attitude, Subjective Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control - are all direct, positive, and significant predictors of EA intention, with Attitude emerging as the strongest. Crucially, the study finds that the four contextual factors only influence intention indirectly, as their effects are fully mediated by the TPB constructs; Corporate Culture and Internal Resources exhibited the greatest total indirect effects. This research provides a significant improvement over existing models by empirically demonstrating this dual-pathway mechanism, suggesting that efforts to promote EA in Vietnam must focus not only on external pressures but also on cultivating positive managerial attitudes and enhancing internal organizational capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging Science Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2025-09-06-06
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Contextual and Behavioral Determinants of Environmental Auditing Adoption

Nguyen Thu Hoai
Emerging Science Journal
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Exploring Contextual and Behavioral Determinants of Environmental Auditing Adoption

Nguyen Thu Hoai
article en

Abstract

This study's primary objective is to identify the determinants of environmental auditing (EA) adoption intention in environmentally sensitive industries. Its novelty lies in developing and testing an integrated model that extends the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by incorporating four contextual factors: Coercive Pressure, Stakeholder Pressure, Internal Resources, and Corporate Culture. For its methodology, the research analyzed survey data from 336 senior managers using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The findings confirm that the three core TPB constructs - Attitude, Subjective Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control - are all direct, positive, and significant predictors of EA intention, with Attitude emerging as the strongest. Crucially, the study finds that the four contextual factors only influence intention indirectly, as their effects are fully mediated by the TPB constructs; Corporate Culture and Internal Resources exhibited the greatest total indirect effects. This research provides a significant improvement over existing models by empirically demonstrating this dual-pathway mechanism, suggesting that efforts to promote EA in Vietnam must focus not only on external pressures but also on cultivating positive managerial attitudes and enhancing internal organizational capabilities.

Emerging Science JournalVol. 9(6)
Thuongmai University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Contextual and Behavioral Determinants of Environmental Auditing Adoption — Nguyen Thu Hoai · Emerging Science Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS