Climate policy beliefs, not problem visibility, drive rural opposition to wind energy projects

Abstract Scholars note an increasing number of cases of rural opposition to wind energy projects (WEPs), commonly attributed to their visual impacts, as their tall steel structures appear out of place in rural settings. In other words, WEPs stand out as ‘visible problems’ in rural areas. Through a pre-registered online survey experiment administered to a representative sample of the U.S. population (n = 1,489), we examine whether WEP’s visual impacts, shaped by their size and the surrounding landscape, drive the rural-urban WEP support gap. We find that urban respondents favor larger WEPs in rural landscapes. In contrast, rural respondents show less support for WEPs irrespective of their size or the surrounding landscape. Mediation analysis suggests that rural opposition stems from rural residents being less likely than urban residents to prioritize climate policies over economic concerns. To ensure rural support, we suggest that policymakers and project developers should not only frame but also design WEPs as viable options to support the rural economy and electricity affordability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae30d7
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate policy beliefs, not problem visibility, drive rural opposition to wind energy projects

Nives Dolšak, Inhwan Ko, Aseem Prakash, Asli Cansunar
Environmental Research Communications
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
article

Climate policy beliefs, not problem visibility, drive rural opposition to wind energy projects

Nives Dolšak, Inhwan Ko, Aseem Prakash, Asli Cansunar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scholars note an increasing number of cases of rural opposition to wind energy projects (WEPs), commonly attributed to their visual impacts, as their tall steel structures appear out of place in rural settings. In other words, WEPs stand out as ‘visible problems’ in rural areas. Through a pre-registered online survey experiment administered to a representative sample of the U.S. population (n = 1,489), we examine whether WEP’s visual impacts, shaped by their size and the surrounding landscape, drive the rural-urban WEP support gap. We find that urban respondents favor larger WEPs in rural landscapes. In contrast, rural respondents show less support for WEPs irrespective of their size or the surrounding landscape. Mediation analysis suggests that rural opposition stems from rural residents being less likely than urban residents to prioritize climate policies over economic concerns. To ensure rural support, we suggest that policymakers and project developers should not only frame but also design WEPs as viable options to support the rural economy and electricity affordability.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 8(3)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Washington (US), University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate policy beliefs, not problem visibility, drive rural opposition to wind energy projects — Nives Dolšak, Inhwan Ko, et al. · Environmental Research Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS