Crucial parameters for precise copy number variation detection in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded solid cancer samples

Copy number variations (CNVs) play a crucial role in cancer diagnostics and prognostics, potentially impacting treatment decisions. Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) has emerged as a promising alternative to array-based methods for CNV detection, especially in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. However, sequencing biases and sample heterogeneity necessitate the optimization of CNV detection tools for FFPE sample-derived data. This study evaluates three open-source CNV callers (CNVpytor, ichorCNA, and WisecondorX) using ULP-WGS and compares their performance against a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Our results demonstrate that under optimal experimental conditions, ichorCNA and WisecondorX achieved equal detection of true positive results, with reduced false positive results compared to the SNP array. The SNP array detection pattern differed somewhat from that of the CNV callers, while ichorCNA and WisecondorX had the most comparable detection pattern. We highlight the importance of (pre-)analytical parameters such as neoplastic cell content, sequencing coverage, and bin size selection on CNV detection accuracy. Our findings support the adoption of ULP-WGS-based CNV detection as a robust alternative to SNP arrays, with WisecondorX emerging as the most suitable tool for clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Oncology
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70192
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crucial parameters for precise copy number variation detection in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded solid cancer samples

Laure Sorber, Elyne Backx, Karen Zwaenepoel, Léon C.L.T. van Kempen et al.
Molecular Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Crucial parameters for precise copy number variation detection in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded solid cancer samples

Laure Sorber, Elyne Backx, Karen Zwaenepoel, Léon C.L.T. van Kempen, Anne Sieben, Hanne Goris, Koen De Winne, Senada Koljenović, Ella Roelant, Stig Hellemans, Vasiliki Siozopoulou
article en

Abstract

Copy number variations (CNVs) play a crucial role in cancer diagnostics and prognostics, potentially impacting treatment decisions. Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) has emerged as a promising alternative to array-based methods for CNV detection, especially in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. However, sequencing biases and sample heterogeneity necessitate the optimization of CNV detection tools for FFPE sample-derived data. This study evaluates three open-source CNV callers (CNVpytor, ichorCNA, and WisecondorX) using ULP-WGS and compares their performance against a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Our results demonstrate that under optimal experimental conditions, ichorCNA and WisecondorX achieved equal detection of true positive results, with reduced false positive results compared to the SNP array. The SNP array detection pattern differed somewhat from that of the CNV callers, while ichorCNA and WisecondorX had the most comparable detection pattern. We highlight the importance of (pre-)analytical parameters such as neoplastic cell content, sequencing coverage, and bin size selection on CNV detection accuracy. Our findings support the adoption of ULP-WGS-based CNV detection as a robust alternative to SNP arrays, with WisecondorX emerging as the most suitable tool for clinical implementation.

Molecular Oncology
University of Antwerp (BE), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Antwerp University Hospital (BE), Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.