Knowledge management in social purpose organizations: a systematic literature review using SPAR-4-SLR process

Purpose This study aims to address the fragmented and theoretically underdeveloped state of Knowledge Management (KM) research in social purpose organizations. While KM is critical for social purpose organizations, the existing literature is geographically biased towards high-income nations and lacks a cohesive framework to guide research and practice. This paper’s primary objective is to identify these critical research voids and propose a comprehensive model to advance the field. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review guided by the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews framework was undertaken, involving the analysis of 48 studies. RStudio and Excel were used to examine and synthesize bibliographic data. A revised conceptual model of integrated KM processes, adapted from Lettieri et al. (2004), is presented based on the findings. Findings The study’s analysis reveals significant gaps in the literature. Thematically, while knowledge sharing and creation are well-documented, there is a lack of research on critical processes like knowledge protection, knowledge retrieval, knowledge spillover, knowledge disconnection and counterproductive knowledge behaviours. The Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methods analysis highlights a lack of theoretical anchoring, contextual diversity and methodological robustness in existing studies. It identifies notable gaps through systematic analysis, offering a strategic roadmap for future inquiry. Research limitations/implications Contextually, the field is dominated by studies from high-income countries and large organizations, limiting the applicability of findings to social purpose organizations in the global South and to smaller organizations. Methodologically, there is a heavy reliance on qualitative studies and a scarcity of longitudinal research. Originality/value This paper makes three distinct contributions. Firstly, it provides the first comprehensive map of the KM in social purpose organizations field using a rigorous hybrid review method that clearly outlines its intellectual structure. Secondly, it proposes a novel integrated KM process model tailored for social purpose organizations, offering a much-needed theoretical framework that synthesizes disparate KM activities. Thirdly, by systematically identifying key theoretical, contextual and methodological gaps, it provides a detailed agenda to guide a new generation of more inclusive and impactful research in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-12-2024-0862
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge management in social purpose organizations: a systematic literature review using SPAR-4-SLR process

Kushal Anjaria, Sushanta Kumar Sarma, Satyendra C. Pandey, Gaurav Tasiwal
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Knowledge management in social purpose organizations: a systematic literature review using SPAR-4-SLR process

Kushal Anjaria, Sushanta Kumar Sarma, Satyendra C. Pandey, Gaurav Tasiwal
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to address the fragmented and theoretically underdeveloped state of Knowledge Management (KM) research in social purpose organizations. While KM is critical for social purpose organizations, the existing literature is geographically biased towards high-income nations and lacks a cohesive framework to guide research and practice. This paper’s primary objective is to identify these critical research voids and propose a comprehensive model to advance the field. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review guided by the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews framework was undertaken, involving the analysis of 48 studies. RStudio and Excel were used to examine and synthesize bibliographic data. A revised conceptual model of integrated KM processes, adapted from Lettieri et al. (2004), is presented based on the findings. Findings The study’s analysis reveals significant gaps in the literature. Thematically, while knowledge sharing and creation are well-documented, there is a lack of research on critical processes like knowledge protection, knowledge retrieval, knowledge spillover, knowledge disconnection and counterproductive knowledge behaviours. The Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methods analysis highlights a lack of theoretical anchoring, contextual diversity and methodological robustness in existing studies. It identifies notable gaps through systematic analysis, offering a strategic roadmap for future inquiry. Research limitations/implications Contextually, the field is dominated by studies from high-income countries and large organizations, limiting the applicability of findings to social purpose organizations in the global South and to smaller organizations. Methodologically, there is a heavy reliance on qualitative studies and a scarcity of longitudinal research. Originality/value This paper makes three distinct contributions. Firstly, it provides the first comprehensive map of the KM in social purpose organizations field using a rigorous hybrid review method that clearly outlines its intellectual structure. Secondly, it proposes a novel integrated KM process model tailored for social purpose organizations, offering a much-needed theoretical framework that synthesizes disparate KM activities. Thirdly, by systematically identifying key theoretical, contextual and methodological gaps, it provides a detailed agenda to guide a new generation of more inclusive and impactful research in the field.

Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Institute of Rural Management Anand (IN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.