Cortical porosity and the accuracy of 109Cd K XRF bone lead measurements in pre-menopausal women

• 109 Cd K XRF bone Pb measurement accuracy is not affected by changes in tibia cortical porosity. • Monte Carlo modelling shows that in vivo heterogeneous distributions of bone Pb do not perturb XRF measurement accuracy. • Large tissue overlay thickness results in inaccurate 109 Cd K XRF tibia Pb measurements. • A non-linear endogenous exposure relationship between blood and bone Pb levels in young women has been observed Studies were performed to test whether tibia cortical porosity could create measurement artifacts in 109 Cd K XRF bone lead (Pb) measurements using Pb-doped plaster of Paris phantoms with a three-dimensional (3D) printed PLA lattice. Phantoms were modelled in MCNP to test the effect of cortical porosity; heterogeneous distributions of Pb; and extremely large tissue overlay thickness on bone Pb measurement accuracy. Modelling showed that cortical porosity of the tibia did not affect the measurement accuracy; measurements were inaccurate in phantoms with extreme heterogeneous distributions of Pb. However, it is only at unrealistic levels of heterogeneity (that are unlikely to be encountered in vivo ) that the measurement becomes inaccurate; and large tissue overlay thicknesses resulted in inaccurate 109 Cd K XRF bone Pb measurements. When blood and 109 Cd K XRF bone Pb data of morbidly obese women were excluded, age related changes in endogenous exposure to Pb were observed in pre-menopausal women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2025.165975
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cortical porosity and the accuracy of 109Cd K XRF bone lead measurements in pre-menopausal women

Fiona E. McNeill, Brendan Sheehan, Renée-Claude Bider
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
article

Cortical porosity and the accuracy of 109Cd K XRF bone lead measurements in pre-menopausal women

Fiona E. McNeill, Brendan Sheehan, Renée-Claude Bider
article en

Abstract

• 109 Cd K XRF bone Pb measurement accuracy is not affected by changes in tibia cortical porosity. • Monte Carlo modelling shows that in vivo heterogeneous distributions of bone Pb do not perturb XRF measurement accuracy. • Large tissue overlay thickness results in inaccurate 109 Cd K XRF tibia Pb measurements. • A non-linear endogenous exposure relationship between blood and bone Pb levels in young women has been observed Studies were performed to test whether tibia cortical porosity could create measurement artifacts in 109 Cd K XRF bone lead (Pb) measurements using Pb-doped plaster of Paris phantoms with a three-dimensional (3D) printed PLA lattice. Phantoms were modelled in MCNP to test the effect of cortical porosity; heterogeneous distributions of Pb; and extremely large tissue overlay thickness on bone Pb measurement accuracy. Modelling showed that cortical porosity of the tibia did not affect the measurement accuracy; measurements were inaccurate in phantoms with extreme heterogeneous distributions of Pb. However, it is only at unrealistic levels of heterogeneity (that are unlikely to be encountered in vivo ) that the measurement becomes inaccurate; and large tissue overlay thicknesses resulted in inaccurate 109 Cd K XRF bone Pb measurements. When blood and 109 Cd K XRF bone Pb data of morbidly obese women were excluded, age related changes in endogenous exposure to Pb were observed in pre-menopausal women.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsVol. 572
McMaster University (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.