A Study of the Reservoir Protection Mechanism of Fuzzy-Ball Workover Fluid for Temporary Plugging in Low-Pressure Oil Well Workover Operations

This study addresses the challenges of low-pressure oil well workover operations, namely, severe loss of water-based workover fluid, significant reservoir damage from conventional temporary plugging agents, and slow production recovery, by focusing on the yet-mechanistically unclear “fuzzy-ball workover fluid.” Laboratory experiments combined with field data were used to evaluate its plugging performance and reservoir-protective mechanisms. In sand-filled tubes (diameter 25 mm, length 20–100 cm) sealed with the fuzzy-ball fluid, the formation’s bearing capacity increased by 3.25–18.59 MPa, showing a positive correlation with the plugging radius. Compatibility tests demonstrated that mixtures of crude oil and workover fluid (1:1) or crude oil, workover fluid, and water (1:1:1) held at 60 °C for 80 h exhibited only minor apparent viscosity reductions of 4 mPa·s and 2 mPa·s, respectively, indicating good stability. After successful plugging, a 1% ammonium persulfate solution was injected for 2 h to break the gel; permeability recovery rates reached 112–127%, confirming low reservoir damage and effective gel-break de-blocking. Field data from five wells (formation pressure coefficients 0.49–0.64) showed per-well fluid consumption of 33–83 m3 and post-workover liquid production index recoveries of 5.90–53.30%. Multivariate regression established mathematical relationships among bearing capacity, production index recovery, and fourteen geological engineering parameters, identifying the plugging radius as a key factor. Larger radii enhance both temporary plugging strength and production recovery without harming the reservoir, and they promote production by expanding the cleaning zone. In summary, the fuzzy-ball workover fluid achieves an integrated “high-efficiency plugging–low-damage gel-break–synergistic cleaning” mechanism, resolving the trade-off between temporary-plugging strength and production recovery in low-pressure wells and offering an innovative, environmentally friendly solution for the sustainable and efficient exploitation of oil–gas resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14010059
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of the Reservoir Protection Mechanism of Fuzzy-Ball Workover Fluid for Temporary Plugging in Low-Pressure Oil Well Workover Operations

Lihui Zheng, Tao Xiujuan, Fanghui Zhu, Yibo Li et al.
Processes
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

A Study of the Reservoir Protection Mechanism of Fuzzy-Ball Workover Fluid for Temporary Plugging in Low-Pressure Oil Well Workover Operations

Lihui Zheng, Tao Xiujuan, Fanghui Zhu, Yibo Li, Mengdi Zhang, Jingyi Yang, Hongwei Shi, Xiaowei Huang, Shuai Li
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the challenges of low-pressure oil well workover operations, namely, severe loss of water-based workover fluid, significant reservoir damage from conventional temporary plugging agents, and slow production recovery, by focusing on the yet-mechanistically unclear “fuzzy-ball workover fluid.” Laboratory experiments combined with field data were used to evaluate its plugging performance and reservoir-protective mechanisms. In sand-filled tubes (diameter 25 mm, length 20–100 cm) sealed with the fuzzy-ball fluid, the formation’s bearing capacity increased by 3.25–18.59 MPa, showing a positive correlation with the plugging radius. Compatibility tests demonstrated that mixtures of crude oil and workover fluid (1:1) or crude oil, workover fluid, and water (1:1:1) held at 60 °C for 80 h exhibited only minor apparent viscosity reductions of 4 mPa·s and 2 mPa·s, respectively, indicating good stability. After successful plugging, a 1% ammonium persulfate solution was injected for 2 h to break the gel; permeability recovery rates reached 112–127%, confirming low reservoir damage and effective gel-break de-blocking. Field data from five wells (formation pressure coefficients 0.49–0.64) showed per-well fluid consumption of 33–83 m3 and post-workover liquid production index recoveries of 5.90–53.30%. Multivariate regression established mathematical relationships among bearing capacity, production index recovery, and fourteen geological engineering parameters, identifying the plugging radius as a key factor. Larger radii enhance both temporary plugging strength and production recovery without harming the reservoir, and they promote production by expanding the cleaning zone. In summary, the fuzzy-ball workover fluid achieves an integrated “high-efficiency plugging–low-damage gel-break–synergistic cleaning” mechanism, resolving the trade-off between temporary-plugging strength and production recovery in low-pressure wells and offering an innovative, environmentally friendly solution for the sustainable and efficient exploitation of oil–gas resources.

ProcessesVol. 14(1)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Energy Foundation (CN), Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.