Using the Characteristics of the Sample Range of Repeated Observations of a Measurand to Estimate Its Numerical Value and Type A Standard Uncertainty

Abstract The article lists situations where it is impractical or impossible to record all observation results during repeated measurements, only their minimum and maximum values. The Monte Carlo method is used to analyze the efficiency of various estimators of the expected value for different distribution laws of observation results. The possibility of determining the estimate of the numerical value and type A standard uncertainty of the measurand using the sample range of results of multiple observations is considered, taking into account their number and the distribution law. The Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the dependence of the coefficient for converting the sample range of multiple measurement results into the sample standard deviation for different distribution laws. The novelty of the article lies in the experimental procedure presented for obtaining the dependence of the conversion coefficient on the number of indicating measuring instrument readings without determining their distribution law. An example is provided for evaluating the numerical value and type A measurement standard uncertainty using the parameters of the sample range of measured humidity values from a standard hygrometer. The novelty of this work is the empirical determination of α for real indication measuring instrument (IMI) readings, which can be used to propose calibration-like procedures for range-based assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science Review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2025-0040
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the Characteristics of the Sample Range of Repeated Observations of a Measurand to Estimate Its Numerical Value and Type A Standard Uncertainty

Igor Zakharov, Olesia Botsiura
Measurement Science Review
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Using the Characteristics of the Sample Range of Repeated Observations of a Measurand to Estimate Its Numerical Value and Type A Standard Uncertainty

Igor Zakharov, Olesia Botsiura
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article lists situations where it is impractical or impossible to record all observation results during repeated measurements, only their minimum and maximum values. The Monte Carlo method is used to analyze the efficiency of various estimators of the expected value for different distribution laws of observation results. The possibility of determining the estimate of the numerical value and type A standard uncertainty of the measurand using the sample range of results of multiple observations is considered, taking into account their number and the distribution law. The Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the dependence of the coefficient for converting the sample range of multiple measurement results into the sample standard deviation for different distribution laws. The novelty of the article lies in the experimental procedure presented for obtaining the dependence of the conversion coefficient on the number of indicating measuring instrument readings without determining their distribution law. An example is provided for evaluating the numerical value and type A measurement standard uncertainty using the parameters of the sample range of measured humidity values from a standard hygrometer. The novelty of this work is the empirical determination of α for real indication measuring instrument (IMI) readings, which can be used to propose calibration-like procedures for range-based assessment.

Measurement Science ReviewVol. 25(6)
Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.