Transparency and Accountability in Local Public Finance: Evidence from Public Parking Fee Allocation

Municipalities worldwide play a crucial role in delivering essential public services to citizens. However, securing adequate resources and sustainable funding remains a persistent challenge for local self-governments. Depending on the state system, local circumstances, societal needs, and policy priorities, municipal revenue structures vary significantly. Yet modern urban municipalities are generally guided by common principles such as equality, solidarity, efficiency, transparency, accountability, and the promotion of public well-being. The adoption of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in the 1980s established an internationally recognized legal framework for local governance and local financing. As a member state of the Council of Europe, North Macedonia adheres to the Charter’s core principles, which emphasize greater local fiscal autonomy and the responsibility of municipalities to manage both their revenues and expenditures independently of the central government. Despite the existing framework, Macedonian municipalities still rely heavily on central government transfers, with own-source revenues – such as property taxes, communal fees, and parking fees – making up a smaller share. Parking fees generally provide modest revenue, mainly funding public-space maintenance, traffic management, and minor infrastructure, and rarely support social welfare. Recently, some cities have introduced structured or solidarity-based parking fees for humanitarian or health purposes. This paper examines the core principles of local financing through an analysis of parking fees, focusing on the emerging practice of “humanitarian parking” as a case study. It employs a qualitative comparative case-study methodology that examines legal frameworks, policies, and practices of public ad solidarity-based parking fees in cities in Macedonia and Serbia, as neighboring countries that share a similar socio-demographic, economic, and legal context. Particular attention is given to the emerging model of “humanitarian parking” as a municipal policy instrument. The analysis assesses the impact of this model on local fiscal autonomy and examines empirical evidence on citizen attitudes, including levels of public support and the transparency of parking-revenue allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European and Comparative Law
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.19249
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency and Accountability in Local Public Finance: Evidence from Public Parking Fee Allocation

Kristina Misheva, Kristijan Panev
Review of European and Comparative Law
Smart Parking Systems Research
article

Transparency and Accountability in Local Public Finance: Evidence from Public Parking Fee Allocation

Kristina Misheva, Kristijan Panev
article en

Abstract

Municipalities worldwide play a crucial role in delivering essential public services to citizens. However, securing adequate resources and sustainable funding remains a persistent challenge for local self-governments. Depending on the state system, local circumstances, societal needs, and policy priorities, municipal revenue structures vary significantly. Yet modern urban municipalities are generally guided by common principles such as equality, solidarity, efficiency, transparency, accountability, and the promotion of public well-being. The adoption of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in the 1980s established an internationally recognized legal framework for local governance and local financing. As a member state of the Council of Europe, North Macedonia adheres to the Charter’s core principles, which emphasize greater local fiscal autonomy and the responsibility of municipalities to manage both their revenues and expenditures independently of the central government. Despite the existing framework, Macedonian municipalities still rely heavily on central government transfers, with own-source revenues – such as property taxes, communal fees, and parking fees – making up a smaller share. Parking fees generally provide modest revenue, mainly funding public-space maintenance, traffic management, and minor infrastructure, and rarely support social welfare. Recently, some cities have introduced structured or solidarity-based parking fees for humanitarian or health purposes. This paper examines the core principles of local financing through an analysis of parking fees, focusing on the emerging practice of “humanitarian parking” as a case study. It employs a qualitative comparative case-study methodology that examines legal frameworks, policies, and practices of public ad solidarity-based parking fees in cities in Macedonia and Serbia, as neighboring countries that share a similar socio-demographic, economic, and legal context. Particular attention is given to the emerging model of “humanitarian parking” as a municipal policy instrument. The analysis assesses the impact of this model on local fiscal autonomy and examines empirical evidence on citizen attitudes, including levels of public support and the transparency of parking-revenue allocation.

Review of European and Comparative LawVol. 63(4)
Goce Delcev University (MK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Smart Parking Systems Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.