Rethinking repeat testing: when analytical criteria tell different stories
Criterion selection is not neutral; it changes both clinical interpretation and operational outcomes. Rule-driven workflows that combine TEa_Obs, TEa_CLIA, and RCV within LIS-based auto verification may reduce unnecessary repeats, stabilize turnaround times, and optimize resource use without compromising patient safety.
Authors
- Özben Özden Işıklar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-4374)
- Zeynep Başoğlu
- Cansu Manav (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7281-4957)
- İ. Özkan ALATAŞ
- Evin Kocatürk
Institutions
- Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
- Published
- 2025-12-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2605639
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00