Quantifying the Fermi paradox via passive SETI: a general framework

In this paper we consider the extent to which a lack of observations from SETI may be used to quantify the Fermi paradox. We compute the probability of at least one detection of an extraterrestrial electromagnetic (EM) signal of Galactic origin, as a function of the number <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> of communicative civilizations. We show how this is derivable from the probability of detecting a single signal; the latter is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the distance between the initial and final EM signals and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the radius of the Milky Way, for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≪</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We show how to combine this analysis with the Drake equation <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>𝒩</mml:mi> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the speed of light; this implies, applying a simplified toy model as an example, that the probability of detecting at least one signal is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>99</mml:mn> <mml:mi>%</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> years, given that <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>𝒩</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Lastly, we list this toy model’s significant limitations, and suggest ways to ameliorate them in more realistic future models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.154771
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Fermi paradox via passive SETI: a general framework

Matthew Civiletti
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

Quantifying the Fermi paradox via passive SETI: a general framework

Matthew Civiletti
article en

Abstract

In this paper we consider the extent to which a lack of observations from SETI may be used to quantify the Fermi paradox. We compute the probability of at least one detection of an extraterrestrial electromagnetic (EM) signal of Galactic origin, as a function of the number <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> of communicative civilizations. We show how this is derivable from the probability of detecting a single signal; the latter is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the distance between the initial and final EM signals and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the radius of the Milky Way, for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≪</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We show how to combine this analysis with the Drake equation <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>𝒩</mml:mi> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the speed of light; this implies, applying a simplified toy model as an example, that the probability of detecting at least one signal is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>99</mml:mn> <mml:mi>%</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>/</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> years, given that <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>𝒩</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Lastly, we list this toy model’s significant limitations, and suggest ways to ameliorate them in more realistic future models.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 8
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.