Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: Redefining Automatic Laryngeal Paralysis Assessment for Optimal Care

Laryngeal motility assessment is essential for diagnosing and managing laryngeal disorders. However, paralysis evaluations suffer from high inter-rater variability, necessitating a more objective and quantitative approach. This study introduces a novel AI-driven pipeline that leverages computer vision techniques to classify 155 video-laryngoscopies into unilateral paralysis (n = 68), bilateral paralysis (n = 50), and healthy laryngeal function (n = 37). Our approach includes several advancements over existing literature. We extract the vocal fold positions from each video and automatically identify the most informative, noise-cleaned video segments for classification. We define novel movement-based features that quantitatively capture the restricted mobility characteristics of laryngeal paralysis. These features are used to train two classification models using a 5-fold cross-validation strategy: one model for binary classification (healthy vs. paralyzed) and the other for multi-class classification (healthy vs. unilateral paralysis vs. bilateral paralysis). To assess the importance of these features, we conduct an ablation study using Shapley values. Our method achieves a precision of 0.83, sensitivity (recall) of 0.85, F1-score of 0.84, and balanced accuracy of 0.85 for distinguishing between healthy and paralyzed individuals. For multi-class classification (healthy vs unilateral paralysis vs bilateral paralysis), our model achieves a precision of 0.80, sensitivity of 0.83, F1-score of 0.81, and a balanced accuracy of 0.83. These results highlight the effectiveness of our method and underscore the relevance of our features, further validated by the ablation study. Our AI-grounded approach enhances the accuracy and reliability of automatic laryngeal motility assessment. By introducing novel metrics to quantify paralysis severity, we provide a more objective, reproducible, and clinically valuable evaluation tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SN Computer Science
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-025-04606-w
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: Redefining Automatic Laryngeal Paralysis Assessment for Optimal Care

Claudio Sampieri, Giorgio Peretti, Andrea Luigi Camillo Carobbio, Stefano Taboni et al.
SN Computer Science
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: Redefining Automatic Laryngeal Paralysis Assessment for Optimal Care

Claudio Sampieri, Giorgio Peretti, Andrea Luigi Camillo Carobbio, Stefano Taboni, Marco Ferrari, Francesca Mularoni, Linda Fiorini, Francesco Pietrogiacomi, Emanuele Agrimi, Piero Nicolai, Isabel Vilaseca, Giorgio Gnecco
article en

Abstract

Laryngeal motility assessment is essential for diagnosing and managing laryngeal disorders. However, paralysis evaluations suffer from high inter-rater variability, necessitating a more objective and quantitative approach. This study introduces a novel AI-driven pipeline that leverages computer vision techniques to classify 155 video-laryngoscopies into unilateral paralysis (n = 68), bilateral paralysis (n = 50), and healthy laryngeal function (n = 37). Our approach includes several advancements over existing literature. We extract the vocal fold positions from each video and automatically identify the most informative, noise-cleaned video segments for classification. We define novel movement-based features that quantitatively capture the restricted mobility characteristics of laryngeal paralysis. These features are used to train two classification models using a 5-fold cross-validation strategy: one model for binary classification (healthy vs. paralyzed) and the other for multi-class classification (healthy vs. unilateral paralysis vs. bilateral paralysis). To assess the importance of these features, we conduct an ablation study using Shapley values. Our method achieves a precision of 0.83, sensitivity (recall) of 0.85, F1-score of 0.84, and balanced accuracy of 0.85 for distinguishing between healthy and paralyzed individuals. For multi-class classification (healthy vs unilateral paralysis vs bilateral paralysis), our model achieves a precision of 0.80, sensitivity of 0.83, F1-score of 0.81, and a balanced accuracy of 0.83. These results highlight the effectiveness of our method and underscore the relevance of our features, further validated by the ablation study. Our AI-grounded approach enhances the accuracy and reliability of automatic laryngeal motility assessment. By introducing novel metrics to quantify paralysis severity, we provide a more objective, reproducible, and clinically valuable evaluation tool.

SN Computer ScienceVol. 7(1)
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT), University of Padua (IT), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), University of Genoa (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.