Two-year outcomes of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis comparing the effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation

Calcium and vitamin D supplementation is commonly recommended in conjunction with osteoporosis treatment. However, some patients are unable to tolerate or take these supplements due to various factors. This study aims to assess the impact of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) changes over a two-year period in patients treated with denosumab, comparing those who received supplements with those who did not. This retrospective study included 344 patients who had received at least four doses of denosumab. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received calcium and vitamin D supplementation and those who did not. BMD was measured annually at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, and denosumab efficacy was assessed by calculating the percentage change in BMD from baseline. We also evaluated BMD changes according to patients' prior osteoporosis treatments and history of osteoporotic fractures. In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted among treatment-naïve patients, comparing those who received denosumab alone with those who received denosumab combined with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The study cohort consisted of 328 women, with a mean age of 70.50 ± 9.48 years. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding prior osteoporosis treatment (P = 0.004) and baseline lumbar spine BMD (P = 0.027). However, no significant differences were observed in BMD changes at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck after one and two years of denosumab treatment, regardless of calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The type of prior osteoporosis medication and the presence of low-energy fragility fractures did not significantly affect BMD changes at either time point. In treatment-naïve patients (n = 209), BMD gains did not differ significantly between those with and without supplementation. Notably, none of the patients reported experiencing adverse events such as injection site infections, myalgia, or symptomatic hypocalcemia. The two-year treatment with denosumab resulted in improvements in BMD that were independent of calcium and vitamin D supplementation. These findings suggest that denosumab may increase BMD regardless of supplementation, though further studies are warranted to confirm this relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28252-7
Primary Topic
Vitamin D Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-year outcomes of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis comparing the effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation

Y. R. Cho, Seong-Eun Byun, Hwan-Hee Lee
Scientific Reports
Vitamin D Research Studies
article

Two-year outcomes of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis comparing the effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation

Y. R. Cho, Seong-Eun Byun, Hwan-Hee Lee
article en

Abstract

Calcium and vitamin D supplementation is commonly recommended in conjunction with osteoporosis treatment. However, some patients are unable to tolerate or take these supplements due to various factors. This study aims to assess the impact of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) changes over a two-year period in patients treated with denosumab, comparing those who received supplements with those who did not. This retrospective study included 344 patients who had received at least four doses of denosumab. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received calcium and vitamin D supplementation and those who did not. BMD was measured annually at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, and denosumab efficacy was assessed by calculating the percentage change in BMD from baseline. We also evaluated BMD changes according to patients' prior osteoporosis treatments and history of osteoporotic fractures. In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted among treatment-naïve patients, comparing those who received denosumab alone with those who received denosumab combined with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The study cohort consisted of 328 women, with a mean age of 70.50 ± 9.48 years. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding prior osteoporosis treatment (P = 0.004) and baseline lumbar spine BMD (P = 0.027). However, no significant differences were observed in BMD changes at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck after one and two years of denosumab treatment, regardless of calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The type of prior osteoporosis medication and the presence of low-energy fragility fractures did not significantly affect BMD changes at either time point. In treatment-naïve patients (n = 209), BMD gains did not differ significantly between those with and without supplementation. Notably, none of the patients reported experiencing adverse events such as injection site infections, myalgia, or symptomatic hypocalcemia. The two-year treatment with denosumab resulted in improvements in BMD that were independent of calcium and vitamin D supplementation. These findings suggest that denosumab may increase BMD regardless of supplementation, though further studies are warranted to confirm this relationship.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Daegu Fatima Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Vitamin D Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.