Diagnostic Evaluation of the Sysmex <scp>XN</scp> ‐ <scp>1000V</scp> Lymphocyte Fluorescence for Differentiating Canine Nodal Large B‐Cell and T‐Cell Lymphoma

Canine lymphoma is a common haematopoietic neoplasm. Immunophenotype is a major prognostic factor and may influence treatment recommendations. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the Sysmex XN-1000V white blood cell differential (WDF) scattergram to differentiate canine nodal large B-cell and T-cell lymphoma, using the percentage of highly fluorescent cells (%HFC) and visual WDF scattergram evaluation. A retrospective study was conducted on data from cases of cytologically diagnosed canine large cell lymphoma. Cases had concurrent lymph node aspirate cell suspensions in saline that were analysed using the Sysmex XN-1000V and multiparametric flow cytometry (FC) for lymphoma classification as B or T-cell. Large B-cell lymphomas (n = 86) showed significantly higher %HFC compared to large T-cell lymphomas (n = 17), with a median (IQR) of 50% (36-84) and 9.7% (3.9-19), respectively. The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.93, with an optimal cutoff of < 24.15 %HFC for identifying T-cell lymphoma, achieving 88.24% sensitivity, 87.21% specificity, 57.69% PPV and 97.40% NPV. The following data is expressed as 'overall-percentage-agreement (kappa value)'. Using the previous cutoff, the agreement between the %HFC classification and FC was 88.24% (κ = 0.76). Regarding the WDF scattergram evaluation, the intra- and inter-observer agreement were 86.27% (κ = 0.71) and 67.65% (κ = 0.55), respectively. Agreement between the WDF scattergram evaluation and FC was 77.45% (κ = 0.55), and improved to 90.63% (κ = 0.74) when just the confident cases were used. In conclusion, a preliminary assessment of the phenotype of canine nodal large cell lymphoma can be made using either the visual inspection of the WDF scattergram or the %HFC. This could serve as a cost-effective, fast screening tool while awaiting definitive flow cytometry results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.70032
Primary Topic
Veterinary Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Evaluation of the Sysmex XN ‐ 1000V Lymphocyte Fluorescence for Differentiating Canine Nodal Large B‐Cell and T‐Cell Lymphoma

Javier Martínez‐Caro, Marta M. Lemos, Josep Maria Canyelles i Pastor, Beatriz Agulla et al.
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology
Veterinary Oncology Research
article

Diagnostic Evaluation of the Sysmex XN ‐ 1000V Lymphocyte Fluorescence for Differentiating Canine Nodal Large B‐Cell and T‐Cell Lymphoma

Javier Martínez‐Caro, Marta M. Lemos, Josep Maria Canyelles i Pastor, Beatriz Agulla, Ignacio Amarillo‐Gómez
article en

Abstract

Canine lymphoma is a common haematopoietic neoplasm. Immunophenotype is a major prognostic factor and may influence treatment recommendations. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the Sysmex XN-1000V white blood cell differential (WDF) scattergram to differentiate canine nodal large B-cell and T-cell lymphoma, using the percentage of highly fluorescent cells (%HFC) and visual WDF scattergram evaluation. A retrospective study was conducted on data from cases of cytologically diagnosed canine large cell lymphoma. Cases had concurrent lymph node aspirate cell suspensions in saline that were analysed using the Sysmex XN-1000V and multiparametric flow cytometry (FC) for lymphoma classification as B or T-cell. Large B-cell lymphomas (n = 86) showed significantly higher %HFC compared to large T-cell lymphomas (n = 17), with a median (IQR) of 50% (36-84) and 9.7% (3.9-19), respectively. The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.93, with an optimal cutoff of < 24.15 %HFC for identifying T-cell lymphoma, achieving 88.24% sensitivity, 87.21% specificity, 57.69% PPV and 97.40% NPV. The following data is expressed as 'overall-percentage-agreement (kappa value)'. Using the previous cutoff, the agreement between the %HFC classification and FC was 88.24% (κ = 0.76). Regarding the WDF scattergram evaluation, the intra- and inter-observer agreement were 86.27% (κ = 0.71) and 67.65% (κ = 0.55), respectively. Agreement between the WDF scattergram evaluation and FC was 77.45% (κ = 0.55), and improved to 90.63% (κ = 0.74) when just the confident cases were used. In conclusion, a preliminary assessment of the phenotype of canine nodal large cell lymphoma can be made using either the visual inspection of the WDF scattergram or the %HFC. This could serve as a cost-effective, fast screening tool while awaiting definitive flow cytometry results.

Veterinary and Comparative OncologyVol. 24(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Zoetis (United States) (US), Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona (Spain) (ES)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Veterinary Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.