The Kids FACE FEARS Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Therapist-Led vs Guided Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Anxiety: Rationale and Methods

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Pediatric anxiety constitutes a serious public health concern. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a "gold standard" treatment, preferred by families over pharmacological options, but barriers limit CBT accessibility. Modern CBT formats include varying levels of therapist involvement and differential technologies to overcome barriers, but little is known about their effectiveness in typical care settings, nor in pediatric care. The Kids Formats of Anxiety Care Effectiveness Study For Extending the Acceptability and Reach of Services (Kids FACE FEARS) trial addresses these gaps. <h3>Method</h3> The Kids FACE FEARS trial was a multisite, pragmatic randomized trial comparing Therapist-Led CBT (telehealth, office-based, or hybrid) versus Guided Internet-based CBT (self-administered/self-paced, with minimal therapist support) for treating youth anxiety (7-18 years) identified in pediatric care. English- and Spanish-speaking families were enrolled from high-volume, urban pediatric healthcare sites affiliated with major medical centers in four metropolitan regions. This paper describes the study's rationale, treatment conditions, participant recruitment, assessment schedule/strategy, and provider training/consultation. <h3>Discussion</h3> Recent innovations have expanded CBT delivery options for pediatric anxiety. This is the first multisite randomized trial directly comparing CBT formats that draw on differential levels of therapist involvement and modes of technology. Sampling and study design features poise the Kids FACE FEARS trial to be one of the largest and most diverse/representative controlled trials of CBT for pediatric anxiety. In the context of evolving CBT delivery options, trial findings can inform patient-centered decision-making and help tailor treatment selections for underserved youth with anxiety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAACAP Open
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.12.003
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Kids FACE FEARS Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Therapist-Led vs Guided Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Anxiety: Rationale and Methods

Alex E. Keller, Dana L. McMakin, Ronald M. Rapee, Michelle V. Porche et al.
JAACAP Open
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

The Kids FACE FEARS Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Therapist-Led vs Guided Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Anxiety: Rationale and Methods

Alex E. Keller, Dana L. McMakin, Ronald M. Rapee, Michelle V. Porche, Julia Lejeune, Molly Adrian, Stefany Coxe, Kendra L. Read, Jennifer Sikov, Haniya Syeda, Alyssa M. Farley, Leslie Miller, Jami M. Furr, M. Ripley, Sara Rivero-Conil, Rheanna Platt, Jonathan S. Comer, Lauren F. McLellan, Amelia J. Brandt, Philip Shumway, Andrea E. Spencer, Lindsay Cooper, Bridget Poznanski, Rachel A. Merson, Lisa R. Fortuna, Donna B. Pincus, Annie Dantowitz, Margarita Alegría, Karen Xiomara Pierre-Louis, Ricardo F. Muñoz, Gary McCreary, Hanan N. Salem, Michelin Jane Janvier, Tomas Munarriz, Anthony Steven Dick, Carolina Costa, Kathleen Myers
article en

Abstract

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Pediatric anxiety constitutes a serious public health concern. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a "gold standard" treatment, preferred by families over pharmacological options, but barriers limit CBT accessibility. Modern CBT formats include varying levels of therapist involvement and differential technologies to overcome barriers, but little is known about their effectiveness in typical care settings, nor in pediatric care. The Kids Formats of Anxiety Care Effectiveness Study For Extending the Acceptability and Reach of Services (Kids FACE FEARS) trial addresses these gaps. <h3>Method</h3> The Kids FACE FEARS trial was a multisite, pragmatic randomized trial comparing Therapist-Led CBT (telehealth, office-based, or hybrid) versus Guided Internet-based CBT (self-administered/self-paced, with minimal therapist support) for treating youth anxiety (7-18 years) identified in pediatric care. English- and Spanish-speaking families were enrolled from high-volume, urban pediatric healthcare sites affiliated with major medical centers in four metropolitan regions. This paper describes the study's rationale, treatment conditions, participant recruitment, assessment schedule/strategy, and provider training/consultation. <h3>Discussion</h3> Recent innovations have expanded CBT delivery options for pediatric anxiety. This is the first multisite randomized trial directly comparing CBT formats that draw on differential levels of therapist involvement and modes of technology. Sampling and study design features poise the Kids FACE FEARS trial to be one of the largest and most diverse/representative controlled trials of CBT for pediatric anxiety. In the context of evolving CBT delivery options, trial findings can inform patient-centered decision-making and help tailor treatment selections for underserved youth with anxiety.

JAACAP OpenVol. 4(2)
University of California, Riverside (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Palo Alto University (US), Simmons University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Wellesley College (US), Florida International University (US), University of Washington (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Caribbean Health Research Council (TT), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Science Council (GB), Miami Children's Hospital (US), Child Development Center (QA), University of Tulsa (US), Macquarie University (AU)
National Science Foundation, Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Once Upon A Time Foundation, Gordon and Marilyn Macklin Foundation, University of Oxford, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.