Boosting machine learning algorithms for porosity prediction in sandstone gas reservoirs

Porosity is one of the crucial properties of a reservoir, which relates to the volume of void space in a rock. The pivotal petrophysical attribute of a rock, with profound implications for hydrocarbon reserve estimation, reservoir evaluation, and petroleum economics, is its porosity. In the laboratory determination of porosity, the acquisition of high-quality samples is imperative. However, the preparation of core samples is encumbered by various constraints, including the challenge of difficulty, expense, and time consumption. That’s why the development of predictive models to determine the reservoir porosity of rocks seems to be an attractive research. Considering the rising interest towards the development of data-driven estimation models, this study utilized five boosting machine learning regression algorithms: Adaptative Boosting (Adaboost), Category Gradient Boosting (Catboost), Light Gradient Boosted Machine (LightGBM), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to determine porosity from a sandstone gas reservoir. Hyper-parameters were tuned within an appropriate tuning search range to optimize the model performance along with Grid Search. A database containing 776 well-log readings was employed to formulate and validate the models. The assessment of model effectiveness involved the utilization of performance metrics such as the coefficient of determination $$\:\:\left({R}^{2}\right)$$ , root mean square error (RMSE), and average absolute percentage error (AAPE). Based on the accuracy of the models, a comparative analysis was conducted, leading to the conclusion that the GBDT model outperforms other developed models significantly, as evidenced by an $$\:{R}^{2}$$ value of 0.92, an impressively low RMSE of 0.0008, and an AAPE of 2.91 for the test dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-02118-0
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boosting machine learning algorithms for porosity prediction in sandstone gas reservoirs

Md. Ashiqul Islam Shuvo, Alamgir Pathan
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Boosting machine learning algorithms for porosity prediction in sandstone gas reservoirs

Md. Ashiqul Islam Shuvo, Alamgir Pathan
article en

Abstract

Porosity is one of the crucial properties of a reservoir, which relates to the volume of void space in a rock. The pivotal petrophysical attribute of a rock, with profound implications for hydrocarbon reserve estimation, reservoir evaluation, and petroleum economics, is its porosity. In the laboratory determination of porosity, the acquisition of high-quality samples is imperative. However, the preparation of core samples is encumbered by various constraints, including the challenge of difficulty, expense, and time consumption. That’s why the development of predictive models to determine the reservoir porosity of rocks seems to be an attractive research. Considering the rising interest towards the development of data-driven estimation models, this study utilized five boosting machine learning regression algorithms: Adaptative Boosting (Adaboost), Category Gradient Boosting (Catboost), Light Gradient Boosted Machine (LightGBM), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to determine porosity from a sandstone gas reservoir. Hyper-parameters were tuned within an appropriate tuning search range to optimize the model performance along with Grid Search. A database containing 776 well-log readings was employed to formulate and validate the models. The assessment of model effectiveness involved the utilization of performance metrics such as the coefficient of determination $$\:\:\left({R}^{2}\right)$$ , root mean square error (RMSE), and average absolute percentage error (AAPE). Based on the accuracy of the models, a comparative analysis was conducted, leading to the conclusion that the GBDT model outperforms other developed models significantly, as evidenced by an $$\:{R}^{2}$$ value of 0.92, an impressively low RMSE of 0.0008, and an AAPE of 2.91 for the test dataset.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production TechnologyVol. 16(1)
Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (BD), University of Chittagong (BD), University of Science and Technology Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.