Landslide Susceptibility of the Territory with Gas-Hydrothermal Manifestations (A Case Study of the Geysernaya River Valley, Kamchatka)

The Geysernaya River valley in Kamchatka, known for its unique hydrothermal manifestations, has experienced activation of slope processes, mainly landslide ones, in recent decades. Three large landslides that occurred in 1981, 2007 and 2014 led to significant changes in the morphology of the valley and the activity mode of some geysers. The article presents an assessment of the susceptibility of the Geysernaya River valley to landslide development, performed using the landslide susceptibility modeling (LSM) approach based on the RandomForest algorithm. Unlike traditional landslide hazard assessment methods, LSM analyzes spatial relationships between past landslide occurrences and a range of natural factors. The model incorporated geological, geomorphological and hydro-geomorphological characteristics, as well as surface thermal anomalies derived from Landsat-8 data for 2017–2021, minus topographic effects (i.e., only as a consequence of the earth’s heat flow, albedo and weather differences). The modeling results indicate that the most landslide-hazardous areas are concentrated along the left side of the Geysernaya River valley within fault zones (mainly along the circular fault of the caldera edge), elevated thermal anomaly zones (∆T > 5°C) and at the contact between weakly lithified volcanogenic–lacustrine deposits (tuff sandstones, tuff gravelites and tuff siltstones) and more resistant extrusive rocks (dacites and liparites). Also, high landslide probabilities are noted on the right side of the valley in the near-edge parts of the Krugloe Plateau and the Geysernaya Extrusion. At the same time, the Shumnaya River valley segment, characterized by similar geological and geomorphological conditions, but lacking active gas-hydrothermal vents, exhibits significantly lower landslide susceptibility values. Here, the near-edge parts of the Shirokoe and Krugloe Plateaus within the considered valley area are most susceptible to landslide processes. Heterogeneous lithology is one of the most essential predictors of landslide susceptibility for both valleys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and Natural Resources
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1875372825700301
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landslide Susceptibility of the Territory with Gas-Hydrothermal Manifestations (A Case Study of the Geysernaya River Valley, Kamchatka)

E. V. Lebedeva, A. V. Kotenkov, S. V. Kharchenko
Geography and Natural Resources
Landslides and related hazards
article

Landslide Susceptibility of the Territory with Gas-Hydrothermal Manifestations (A Case Study of the Geysernaya River Valley, Kamchatka)

E. V. Lebedeva, A. V. Kotenkov, S. V. Kharchenko
article en

Abstract

The Geysernaya River valley in Kamchatka, known for its unique hydrothermal manifestations, has experienced activation of slope processes, mainly landslide ones, in recent decades. Three large landslides that occurred in 1981, 2007 and 2014 led to significant changes in the morphology of the valley and the activity mode of some geysers. The article presents an assessment of the susceptibility of the Geysernaya River valley to landslide development, performed using the landslide susceptibility modeling (LSM) approach based on the RandomForest algorithm. Unlike traditional landslide hazard assessment methods, LSM analyzes spatial relationships between past landslide occurrences and a range of natural factors. The model incorporated geological, geomorphological and hydro-geomorphological characteristics, as well as surface thermal anomalies derived from Landsat-8 data for 2017–2021, minus topographic effects (i.e., only as a consequence of the earth’s heat flow, albedo and weather differences). The modeling results indicate that the most landslide-hazardous areas are concentrated along the left side of the Geysernaya River valley within fault zones (mainly along the circular fault of the caldera edge), elevated thermal anomaly zones (∆T > 5°C) and at the contact between weakly lithified volcanogenic–lacustrine deposits (tuff sandstones, tuff gravelites and tuff siltstones) and more resistant extrusive rocks (dacites and liparites). Also, high landslide probabilities are noted on the right side of the valley in the near-edge parts of the Krugloe Plateau and the Geysernaya Extrusion. At the same time, the Shumnaya River valley segment, characterized by similar geological and geomorphological conditions, but lacking active gas-hydrothermal vents, exhibits significantly lower landslide susceptibility values. Here, the near-edge parts of the Shirokoe and Krugloe Plateaus within the considered valley area are most susceptible to landslide processes. Heterogeneous lithology is one of the most essential predictors of landslide susceptibility for both valleys.

Geography and Natural ResourcesVol. 46(3)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Geography (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.