Three‐dimensional‐printed tools to democratize global plant research

Abstract Numerous activities in the plant sciences require time‐consuming, repetitive actions that are ideal for automation, but existing tools to accomplish these types of tasks are often priced beyond the reach of many research labs, especially in low‐resource environments. We developed a suite of easy‐to‐use, three‐dimensional (3D)‐printable tools for seed handling, tissue collection, and bead dispensing. The designs were made using accessible software and tested for speed and accuracy across multiple crops. Compared to commercial and manual methods, the 3D‐printed tools were significantly faster with comparable or superior accuracy. Costs of printed tools were 0.1%–21% of commercial equivalents. All designs are freely available online and can be easily adjusted to suit different research needs or printer types. Inexpensive, open‐source hardware can meaningfully increase throughput, standardization, and reproducibility in plant research, especially for programs operating under budget constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Science
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.70222
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three‐dimensional‐printed tools to democratize global plant research

Mason C. McNair, Trevor W. Rife, Blake Wilson
Crop Science
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
article

Three‐dimensional‐printed tools to democratize global plant research

Mason C. McNair, Trevor W. Rife, Blake Wilson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Numerous activities in the plant sciences require time‐consuming, repetitive actions that are ideal for automation, but existing tools to accomplish these types of tasks are often priced beyond the reach of many research labs, especially in low‐resource environments. We developed a suite of easy‐to‐use, three‐dimensional (3D)‐printable tools for seed handling, tissue collection, and bead dispensing. The designs were made using accessible software and tested for speed and accuracy across multiple crops. Compared to commercial and manual methods, the 3D‐printed tools were significantly faster with comparable or superior accuracy. Costs of printed tools were 0.1%–21% of commercial equivalents. All designs are freely available online and can be easily adjusted to suit different research needs or printer types. Inexpensive, open‐source hardware can meaningfully increase throughput, standardization, and reproducibility in plant research, especially for programs operating under budget constraints.

Crop ScienceVol. 66(1)
Clemson University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.