A Short Form of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA-SF)

The original and long-form Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA) was previously found to be a valid and reliable measurement of adolescent dating abuse (ADA) and addresses limitations of other ADA assessment tools. However, the MARSHA may be prohibitively long for researchers and clinicians who need a more concise ADA assessment tool. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of a short form of the MARSHA (MARSHA-SF). The MARSHA-SF includes seven victimization items and seven parallel perpetration items covering multiple aspects of ADA, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, and intimidation. Using a cross-sectional design, we evaluated the MARSHA-SF through an online survey administered to a national sample of 688 adolescents aged 13 to 21 who reported dating, hooking up with, or being in a romantic relationship within the past year. To evaluate the MARSHA-SF, we used confirmatory factor analysis and assessed concurrent validity with the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) and divergent validity with the Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89). Results showed that both MARSHA-SF victimization and perpetration measures had good factor loadings and model fit, along with good internal consistency across age groups. Both MARSHA-SF victimization and perpetration scores were also strongly and positively correlated with the MARSHA long form and CADRI scores. These findings show that the MARSHA-SF is an effective assessment tool for researchers looking to quickly assess ADA victimization and/or perpetration. The MARSHA-SF offers researchers and clinicians several benefits, including that it incorporates modern forms of ADA such as pressure to send nude photos, was designed to capture ADA across multiple stages of adolescence, specifically excludes adolescent joking or playful behaviors, and was validated using a national and demographically diverse sample of adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251398463
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Short Form of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA-SF)

Caroline Lancaster, Emily F. Rothman, Jennifer Paruk
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

A Short Form of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA-SF)

Caroline Lancaster, Emily F. Rothman, Jennifer Paruk
article en

Abstract

The original and long-form Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA) was previously found to be a valid and reliable measurement of adolescent dating abuse (ADA) and addresses limitations of other ADA assessment tools. However, the MARSHA may be prohibitively long for researchers and clinicians who need a more concise ADA assessment tool. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of a short form of the MARSHA (MARSHA-SF). The MARSHA-SF includes seven victimization items and seven parallel perpetration items covering multiple aspects of ADA, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, and intimidation. Using a cross-sectional design, we evaluated the MARSHA-SF through an online survey administered to a national sample of 688 adolescents aged 13 to 21 who reported dating, hooking up with, or being in a romantic relationship within the past year. To evaluate the MARSHA-SF, we used confirmatory factor analysis and assessed concurrent validity with the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) and divergent validity with the Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89). Results showed that both MARSHA-SF victimization and perpetration measures had good factor loadings and model fit, along with good internal consistency across age groups. Both MARSHA-SF victimization and perpetration scores were also strongly and positively correlated with the MARSHA long form and CADRI scores. These findings show that the MARSHA-SF is an effective assessment tool for researchers looking to quickly assess ADA victimization and/or perpetration. The MARSHA-SF offers researchers and clinicians several benefits, including that it incorporates modern forms of ADA such as pressure to send nude photos, was designed to capture ADA across multiple stages of adolescence, specifically excludes adolescent joking or playful behaviors, and was validated using a national and demographically diverse sample of adolescents.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston University (US), University of Chicago (US)
Gender equality, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.