Large Language Models in Legal Systems: A Survey

Abstract This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the role of large language models (LLMs) in legal systems. It examines their applications across key areas such as legal document drafting, case analysis, research, compliance monitoring, and education. In addition to mapping these use cases, the survey reviews datasets and benchmarks that enable the training and fine-tuning of LLMs for legal tasks. The analysis highlights both the opportunities and challenges of adopting LLMs in practice, including issues of bias, interpretability, accuracy, and ethical risk. Particular attention is given to the limitations of current models and the risks of overstating their reliability in high-stakes legal contexts. By synthesizing recent advancements, this paper provides a balanced perspective on the current state of LLMs in the legal domain and outlines future directions for research and practice aimed at improving their effectiveness, accountability, and responsible deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05924-3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Models in Legal Systems: A Survey

Yazdan Naderzadeh Ardebili, Shahryar Rahnamayan, Roya Dehghani, Fatemeh Dehghani
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Large Language Models in Legal Systems: A Survey

Yazdan Naderzadeh Ardebili, Shahryar Rahnamayan, Roya Dehghani, Fatemeh Dehghani
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the role of large language models (LLMs) in legal systems. It examines their applications across key areas such as legal document drafting, case analysis, research, compliance monitoring, and education. In addition to mapping these use cases, the survey reviews datasets and benchmarks that enable the training and fine-tuning of LLMs for legal tasks. The analysis highlights both the opportunities and challenges of adopting LLMs in practice, including issues of bias, interpretability, accuracy, and ethical risk. Particular attention is given to the limitations of current models and the risks of overstating their reliability in high-stakes legal contexts. By synthesizing recent advancements, this paper provides a balanced perspective on the current state of LLMs in the legal domain and outlines future directions for research and practice aimed at improving their effectiveness, accountability, and responsible deployment.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Brock University (CA), Ontario Tech University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.