Exploring Factors Influencing ChatGPT-Assisted Learning Satisfaction from an Information Systems Success Model Perspective: The Case of Art and Design Students

As education undergoes digital transformation, ChatGPT-4 has emerged as one of the most visible tools of generative artificial intelligence. While widely discussed, its impact on student satisfaction and learning outcomes in higher education remains underexplored. This study investigates the factors that shape art and design students’ satisfaction when using ChatGPT to support coursework. Unlike previous research focusing on ChatGPT adoption behavior, this study extends the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) to the context of art and design education. Drawing on 435 valid survey responses, we employed a mixed-methods approach. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was first applied to examine how system quality, compatibility, personal innovativeness, and perceived usefulness influence satisfaction directly and through mediating mechanisms. To complement this, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) was used to identify multiple combinations of conditions that lead to high satisfaction. The findings show that compatibility, perceived usefulness, and personal innovativeness significantly enhance satisfaction, with path coefficients of 0.378, 0.342, and 0.155, respectively. Importance–Performance Map Analysis (IPMA) further highlights personal innovativeness and system quality as critical drivers. By providing both theoretical and practical insights, this study contributes to the growing body of research on generative AI in art and design education and informs the design of courses and digital learning tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Factors Influencing ChatGPT-Assisted Learning Satisfaction from an Information Systems Success Model Perspective: The Case of Art and Design Students

Xinqiang Chen, D. Y. Li, Ziqing Zhuo, Shuaijun Wang et al.
2 citations
Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Exploring Factors Influencing ChatGPT-Assisted Learning Satisfaction from an Information Systems Success Model Perspective: The Case of Art and Design Students

Xinqiang Chen, D. Y. Li, Ziqing Zhuo, Shuaijun Wang, Jiangjie Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As education undergoes digital transformation, ChatGPT-4 has emerged as one of the most visible tools of generative artificial intelligence. While widely discussed, its impact on student satisfaction and learning outcomes in higher education remains underexplored. This study investigates the factors that shape art and design students’ satisfaction when using ChatGPT to support coursework. Unlike previous research focusing on ChatGPT adoption behavior, this study extends the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) to the context of art and design education. Drawing on 435 valid survey responses, we employed a mixed-methods approach. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was first applied to examine how system quality, compatibility, personal innovativeness, and perceived usefulness influence satisfaction directly and through mediating mechanisms. To complement this, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) was used to identify multiple combinations of conditions that lead to high satisfaction. The findings show that compatibility, perceived usefulness, and personal innovativeness significantly enhance satisfaction, with path coefficients of 0.378, 0.342, and 0.155, respectively. Importance–Performance Map Analysis (IPMA) further highlights personal innovativeness and system quality as critical drivers. By providing both theoretical and practical insights, this study contributes to the growing body of research on generative AI in art and design education and informs the design of courses and digital learning tools.

SystemsVol. 14(1)
Jiangnan University (CN), Huaqiao University (CN), City University of Macau (MO), Xiamen University of Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.