Treatment effect based on antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections related to orthopedics

Staphylococcus aureus is a prevalent pathogen in infections related to orthopedics. Here, we report on the antimicrobial resistance and treatment with emphasis on both clinical and microbiological perspectives. We recruited 196 patients with S. aureus isolates. Antimicrobial resistance was described by resistance rates, and multidrug resistance (MDR) was classified according to international standards. Antimicrobial agents were classified as active, untested, or inactive according to the antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The treatment stage was divided into empirical and targeted stages, and effects were classified as first-, second-, or third-grade healing. Resistance rates ranged from 0.0 to 89.2%, and no resistance to vancomycin or linezolid was found. As the signal of methicillin resistance, the incidence of oxacillin resistance was 21.0%. MDR was identified in 84 (42.9%) isolates, not related to gender (p = 0.505) or age (p = 0.459). Cefuroxime and cefazolin were common untested agents, whereas clindamycin and levofloxacin were common active agents used in treatment. Out of the participants, 173 had first-grade healing, 16 had second-grade healing, and 7 had third-grade healing. Of the patients who received active and untested agents, the numbers of patients who had first-, second-, and third-grade healing were 74, 6, and 4 vs. 99, 10, and 3 (p = 0.709), respectively. Among the patients who received untested agents during empirical treatment, 20.9% (28/134) switched to active agents for treatment success. Antimicrobial resistance is a prevalent concern, especially methicillin resistance. Active agents represented by clindamycin and levofloxacin are valuable according to antimicrobial susceptibility tests and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33687-z
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment effect based on antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections related to orthopedics

Qi Yao, Fei Liu, Linjie Tu, Yuqin Zhu et al.
Scientific Reports
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Treatment effect based on antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections related to orthopedics

Qi Yao, Fei Liu, Linjie Tu, Yuqin Zhu, Ping Yuan, Bing Ge, Aijing Li
article en

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a prevalent pathogen in infections related to orthopedics. Here, we report on the antimicrobial resistance and treatment with emphasis on both clinical and microbiological perspectives. We recruited 196 patients with S. aureus isolates. Antimicrobial resistance was described by resistance rates, and multidrug resistance (MDR) was classified according to international standards. Antimicrobial agents were classified as active, untested, or inactive according to the antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The treatment stage was divided into empirical and targeted stages, and effects were classified as first-, second-, or third-grade healing. Resistance rates ranged from 0.0 to 89.2%, and no resistance to vancomycin or linezolid was found. As the signal of methicillin resistance, the incidence of oxacillin resistance was 21.0%. MDR was identified in 84 (42.9%) isolates, not related to gender (p = 0.505) or age (p = 0.459). Cefuroxime and cefazolin were common untested agents, whereas clindamycin and levofloxacin were common active agents used in treatment. Out of the participants, 173 had first-grade healing, 16 had second-grade healing, and 7 had third-grade healing. Of the patients who received active and untested agents, the numbers of patients who had first-, second-, and third-grade healing were 74, 6, and 4 vs. 99, 10, and 3 (p = 0.709), respectively. Among the patients who received untested agents during empirical treatment, 20.9% (28/134) switched to active agents for treatment success. Antimicrobial resistance is a prevalent concern, especially methicillin resistance. Active agents represented by clindamycin and levofloxacin are valuable according to antimicrobial susceptibility tests and clinical practice.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
The Fourth People's Hospital (CN), The First People's Hospital of Guiyang (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Treatment effect based on antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections related to orthopedics — Qi Yao, Fei Liu, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS