Continent-wide view of genomic diversity and divergence in the wolves of Asia

Grey wolves (Canis lupus) in Asia hold most of the species' genetic diversity and many endangered populations. However, a clear understanding of the evolutionary history of wolves in Asia is lacking, hindering their conservation. We used 98 whole genomes of wolves across Eurasia to better resolve their evolutionary history and conservation status. The strongest barriers to gene flow coincided with boundaries separating the three major wolf lineages - Indian, Tibetan, and Holarctic. Wolves in the central Asian mountain ranges belonged to the Holarctic lineage and share little ancestry with the nearby Tibetan lineage. In contrast, wolves from eastern Asia share population-wide ancestry with the Tibetan lineage, which may reflect an unsampled lineage similar to the Tibetan lineage. Wolves from southwestern Asia share population-wide ancestry with the Indian lineage, likely due to old (>6 kya) admixture events. Long-term declines and recent inbreeding have left Indian and Tibetan wolves with some of the lowest levels of genetic diversity and highest realized genetic loads. In contrast, adjacent populations have some of the highest genetic diversity, due in part to admixture along contact zones. Our study highlights southern regions of Asia as hotspots of wolf diversity and the need to conserve these remaining populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09379-9
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continent-wide view of genomic diversity and divergence in the wolves of Asia

Ghulam Sarwar, M. F. SINDING, Frank Hailer, Xin Sun et al.
Communications Biology
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

Continent-wide view of genomic diversity and divergence in the wolves of Asia

Ghulam Sarwar, M. F. SINDING, Frank Hailer, Xin Sun, B. Habib, Lauren M. Hennelly, Pavel Hulva, Hira Fatima, Hans K. Stenøien, A. F. Youssef, Ladislav Paule, Samara P El-Haddad, Nuno Filipes Gomes Martins, Çağan H. Şekercioğlu, Ash Noble, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Pavel Kosintsev, Benjamin N. Sacks, Bárbara R. Parreira, M. Çisel Kemahlı Aytekin, Camilla H. Scharff-Olsen, M. Thomas P. Gilbert
article en

Abstract

Grey wolves (Canis lupus) in Asia hold most of the species' genetic diversity and many endangered populations. However, a clear understanding of the evolutionary history of wolves in Asia is lacking, hindering their conservation. We used 98 whole genomes of wolves across Eurasia to better resolve their evolutionary history and conservation status. The strongest barriers to gene flow coincided with boundaries separating the three major wolf lineages - Indian, Tibetan, and Holarctic. Wolves in the central Asian mountain ranges belonged to the Holarctic lineage and share little ancestry with the nearby Tibetan lineage. In contrast, wolves from eastern Asia share population-wide ancestry with the Tibetan lineage, which may reflect an unsampled lineage similar to the Tibetan lineage. Wolves from southwestern Asia share population-wide ancestry with the Indian lineage, likely due to old (>6 kya) admixture events. Long-term declines and recent inbreeding have left Indian and Tibetan wolves with some of the lowest levels of genetic diversity and highest realized genetic loads. In contrast, adjacent populations have some of the highest genetic diversity, due in part to admixture along contact zones. Our study highlights southern regions of Asia as hotspots of wolf diversity and the need to conserve these remaining populations.

Communications BiologyVol. 9(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Ural Federal University (RU), Koç University (TR), Lebanese University (LB), University of the Punjab (PK), University of Ostrava (CZ), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Charles University (CZ), University of Utah (US), Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US), Wildlife Institute of India (IN), Technická univerzita vo Zvolene (SK), Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (RU), Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute (LB), Turkish Society of Cardiology (TR), Institute of Zoology (CN), University of Education (PK), Rice University (US), Cardiff University (GB), University of California, Davis (US)
National Science Foundation, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miljødirektoratet, Fondation Segré
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.