Wine critic and winemaker gender alignment in sensory wine evaluation: exploratory analysis in Austria and Germany
Purpose This exploratory study offers the first cross-national analysis of gender alignment (i.e. situation where the wine evaluator and the winemaker share the same gender) effects in professional wine evaluation, using blind tasting data from Wine Enthusiast (Austria n = 3,307; Germany n = 1,779). Design/methodology/approach Using statistical analysis, including OLS regressions with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors, we test whether evaluator–winemaker gender alignment influences expert scores and whether this effect varies by wine type and grape variety, controlling for price. Findings We find that female evaluators assign higher scores than male evaluators. However, female winemakers receive significantly higher scores only when evaluated by female critics – particularly for high-acidity, aromatic white wines like Riesling and Grüner Veltliner. No alignment effect is observed in red wines or other gender pairings. Wine assignments show no systematic gender matching, supporting the blind tasting protocol's integrity. Research limitations/implications Estimates are critic-specific (one evaluator per gender per country) rather than population-level, though alignment patterns replicate across both national contexts. Findings indicate the need for diversified evaluation panels, systematic evaluator rotation and calibration training to mitigate context-dependent gender dynamics in professional sensory assessment. Originality/value These findings indicate that gender alignment effects are context-dependent and emerge under specific sensory and demographic conditions.
Authors
- Ömer Gökçekuş (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-5918)
- Magalie Dubois
Institutions
- School of International Relations (IR)
- Business France (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Food Journal
- Published
- 2025-12-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2025-0853
- Primary Topic
- Wine Industry and Tourism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00