Retrocochlear Auditory Dysfunctions (RADs) and Their Treatment: A Narrative Review

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Retrocochlear auditory dysfunctions (RADs), including auditory neuropathy (AN) and auditory processing disorders (APD), encompass disorders characterized by impaired auditory processing beyond the cochlea. This narrative review critically examines their distinguishing features, synthesizing recent advances in classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. <b>Methods</b>: This narrative review involved a comprehensive literature search across major electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) to identify and synthesize relevant studies on the classification, diagnosis, and management of AN and APD. The goal was to update the view on etiologies (genetic/non-genetic) and individualized rehabilitative strategies. Diagnosis relies on a comprehensive assessment, including behavioral, electrophysiological, and imaging tests. Rehabilitation is categorized into bottom-up and top-down approaches. <b>Results</b>: ANSD is defined by neural desynchronization with preserved outer hair cell function, resulting in abnormal auditory brainstem responses and poor speech discrimination. The etiologies (distal/proximal) influence the prognosis for interventions, particularly cochlear implants (CI). APD involves central processing deficits, often with normal peripheral hearing and heterogeneous symptoms affecting speech perception and localization. Rehabilitation is multidisciplinary, utilizing bottom-up strategies (e.g., auditory training, CI) and compensatory top-down approaches. Remote microphone systems are highly effective in improving the signal-to-noise ratio. <b>Conclusions</b>: Accurate diagnosis and personalized, multidisciplinary management are crucial for optimizing communication and quality of life. Evidence suggests that combined bottom-up and top-down interventions may yield superior outcomes. However, methodological heterogeneity limits the generalizability of protocols, highlighting the need for further targeted research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16010005
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrocochlear Auditory Dysfunctions (RADs) and Their Treatment: A Narrative Review

Rosamaria Santarelli, Domenico Cuda, Chiarella Giuseppe, Patrizia Mancini
Audiology Research
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Retrocochlear Auditory Dysfunctions (RADs) and Their Treatment: A Narrative Review

Rosamaria Santarelli, Domenico Cuda, Chiarella Giuseppe, Patrizia Mancini
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Retrocochlear auditory dysfunctions (RADs), including auditory neuropathy (AN) and auditory processing disorders (APD), encompass disorders characterized by impaired auditory processing beyond the cochlea. This narrative review critically examines their distinguishing features, synthesizing recent advances in classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. <b>Methods</b>: This narrative review involved a comprehensive literature search across major electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) to identify and synthesize relevant studies on the classification, diagnosis, and management of AN and APD. The goal was to update the view on etiologies (genetic/non-genetic) and individualized rehabilitative strategies. Diagnosis relies on a comprehensive assessment, including behavioral, electrophysiological, and imaging tests. Rehabilitation is categorized into bottom-up and top-down approaches. <b>Results</b>: ANSD is defined by neural desynchronization with preserved outer hair cell function, resulting in abnormal auditory brainstem responses and poor speech discrimination. The etiologies (distal/proximal) influence the prognosis for interventions, particularly cochlear implants (CI). APD involves central processing deficits, often with normal peripheral hearing and heterogeneous symptoms affecting speech perception and localization. Rehabilitation is multidisciplinary, utilizing bottom-up strategies (e.g., auditory training, CI) and compensatory top-down approaches. Remote microphone systems are highly effective in improving the signal-to-noise ratio. <b>Conclusions</b>: Accurate diagnosis and personalized, multidisciplinary management are crucial for optimizing communication and quality of life. Evidence suggests that combined bottom-up and top-down interventions may yield superior outcomes. However, methodological heterogeneity limits the generalizability of protocols, highlighting the need for further targeted research.

Audiology ResearchVol. 16(1)
University of Parma (IT), AOL (United States) (US), University of Padua (IT), Magna Graecia University (IT), Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.