Generative AI, Academic Deepfakes, and Epistemic Pollution

Concerns about GenAI’s energy use and physical pollution are well known. This commentary highlights another threat: epistemic pollution—the degradation of our knowledge ecosystem through low-quality, misleading, or fabricated information. Drawing on a recent pseudo-scientific article co-authored by Grok 3, we discuss the rise of academic deepfakes and their contribution to epistemic pollution. We show how GenAI makes academic deepfakes cheaper, more accessible, and harder to detect. The resulting epistemic pollution poses acute risks in fields like Business & Society , which draw on multidisciplinary knowledge and engage with politically sensitive topics. Yet, by extending the analogy between epistemic and physical pollution, we suggest that Business & Society scholars are also well placed to study the problem and respond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business & Society
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503251406457
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI, Academic Deepfakes, and Epistemic Pollution

Aurélien Acquier, Jozef Cossey
Business & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Generative AI, Academic Deepfakes, and Epistemic Pollution

Aurélien Acquier, Jozef Cossey
article en

Abstract

Concerns about GenAI’s energy use and physical pollution are well known. This commentary highlights another threat: epistemic pollution—the degradation of our knowledge ecosystem through low-quality, misleading, or fabricated information. Drawing on a recent pseudo-scientific article co-authored by Grok 3, we discuss the rise of academic deepfakes and their contribution to epistemic pollution. We show how GenAI makes academic deepfakes cheaper, more accessible, and harder to detect. The resulting epistemic pollution poses acute risks in fields like Business & Society , which draw on multidisciplinary knowledge and engage with politically sensitive topics. Yet, by extending the analogy between epistemic and physical pollution, we suggest that Business & Society scholars are also well placed to study the problem and respond.

Business & SocietyVol. 65(3)
ESCP Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.