The Right to Information in Criminal Proceedings Regarding the Confiscation of Criminally Acquired Property

The authors of the current article examine the right to information in criminal proceedings regarding the confiscation of criminally acquired property. The paper provides a detailed overview of the legislative development in Latvia, with a focus on the evolution of Section 627 of the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), as well as analysis of case law by the Constitutional Court. The authors explore the application of Directive 2014/42/EU, the role of judicial control, and the impact of procedural safeguards on the rights of affected persons. Particular attention is paid to procedural distinctions between different types of proceedings, including those initiated during pre-trial investigation. The findings highlight ongoing challenges in practice, despite improvements in legal regulation, emphasizing the importance of ensuring equal access to information for all parties involved in the confiscation of criminal assets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.19.10
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right to Information in Criminal Proceedings Regarding the Confiscation of Criminally Acquired Property

Jānis Rozenbergs, Kristīne Hofmane
JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

The Right to Information in Criminal Proceedings Regarding the Confiscation of Criminally Acquired Property

Jānis Rozenbergs, Kristīne Hofmane
article en

Abstract

The authors of the current article examine the right to information in criminal proceedings regarding the confiscation of criminally acquired property. The paper provides a detailed overview of the legislative development in Latvia, with a focus on the evolution of Section 627 of the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), as well as analysis of case law by the Constitutional Court. The authors explore the application of Directive 2014/42/EU, the role of judicial control, and the impact of procedural safeguards on the rights of affected persons. Particular attention is paid to procedural distinctions between different types of proceedings, including those initiated during pre-trial investigation. The findings highlight ongoing challenges in practice, despite improvements in legal regulation, emphasizing the importance of ensuring equal access to information for all parties involved in the confiscation of criminal assets.

JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW(19)
University of Latvia (LV)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.