Bioretention Flow-Through Planter Performance and Design Considerations

This study monitored four bioretention planters installed at Stevens Institute of Technology providing information on the hydrologic mitigation potential of planters and design considerations for future guidance. Monitoring during 18 months spanning 3 calendar years compared performance against several bioretention system design objectives, including fully captured events, peak flow reduction, and runoff retention. Hydraulic loading ratio and media porosity affected the fraction of captured events, with one-fifth of the events completely captured. The captured storms were less than 2.0 mm/m2 of drainage area 77% of the time. The planters halved the peak flow rate for 61% of observations. The entire media volume was wetted in almost half of the events but rarely fully saturated. A modified available water capacity calculation based on the difference between the field capacity and the lowest measured volumetric water content provided a useful estimate of the median retention per event. To use this estimator, it is proposed to estimate the modified available water capacity as the difference between the laboratory-measured field capacity and a laboratory-measured wilting point increased by a factor of safety to account for the practical issue that the planters never dried fully between rain events in the New Jersey temperate climate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jswbay.sweng-582
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioretention Flow-Through Planter Performance and Design Considerations

Michael Borst, Elizabeth Fassman‐Beck, Kiera A. Nissen, Rita Sousa
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Bioretention Flow-Through Planter Performance and Design Considerations

Michael Borst, Elizabeth Fassman‐Beck, Kiera A. Nissen, Rita Sousa
article en

Abstract

This study monitored four bioretention planters installed at Stevens Institute of Technology providing information on the hydrologic mitigation potential of planters and design considerations for future guidance. Monitoring during 18 months spanning 3 calendar years compared performance against several bioretention system design objectives, including fully captured events, peak flow reduction, and runoff retention. Hydraulic loading ratio and media porosity affected the fraction of captured events, with one-fifth of the events completely captured. The captured storms were less than 2.0 mm/m2 of drainage area 77% of the time. The planters halved the peak flow rate for 61% of observations. The entire media volume was wetted in almost half of the events but rarely fully saturated. A modified available water capacity calculation based on the difference between the field capacity and the lowest measured volumetric water content provided a useful estimate of the median retention per event. To use this estimator, it is proposed to estimate the modified available water capacity as the difference between the laboratory-measured field capacity and a laboratory-measured wilting point increased by a factor of safety to account for the practical issue that the planters never dried fully between rain events in the New Jersey temperate climate.

Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built EnvironmentVol. 12(2)
Stevens Institute of Technology (US), Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (US), Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US), Environmental and Water Resources Engineering (IL), Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, New York University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.