Geochemical and Geochronological Constraints on the Petrogenesis and Tectonic Evolution of Li‐Pegmatites and Granites in Phang Nga and Phuket, Southern Thailand

ABSTRACT Lepidolite‐bearing pegmatite, recently recognized as a major lithium (Li) resource, is exposed in Phang Nga, southern Thailand. This study investigates the geological relationships between Li‐pegmatites and granitic rocks and their formation processes within the tectonic evolution of the study area, using petrological, geochemical, and geochronological data. The granitic rocks in the study area are classified into three types: I‐type biotite granite, both I‐ and S‐type biotite–muscovite granite, and S‐type tourmaline granite. The Li‐pegmatite shows S‐type characteristics with peraluminous features. The primitive mantle‐normalized spider diagram of Li‐pegmatite and tourmaline granite reveals similar patterns, with enrichment in large‐ion lithophile elements (e.g., Cs, Rb, Li, and U) and depletion in Ba, Nb, and Sr, suggesting that the Li‐pegmatite evolved from a highly fractionated tourmaline granitic melt. Zircon U–Pb dating of the granites indicates three main magmatic events: Late Triassic biotite granite and tourmaline granite (216–214 Ma), Late Cretaceous biotite–muscovite granite and tourmaline granite (83–81 Ma), and Paleocene biotite granite (60–58 Ma). The cassiterite U–Pb ages of Li‐pegmatites are 81 and 69 Ma, which are coeval with the Late Cretaceous tourmaline granite. Newly found Late Triassic granites in the Western Granitoid Belt suggest that the Triassic granitic magmatism of the Central Granitoid Belt may extend further into southern Thailand than previously known. The formation of the Late Triassic biotite granite and tourmaline granite is related to the collision events between the Sibumasu and Indochina Terranes following the closure of the Paleo‐Tethys Ocean. Subsequently, during the Late Cretaceous, biotite–muscovite granite, tourmaline granite, and associated Li‐pegmatites formed due to the West Burma–Sibumasu collision and the subduction of the Neo‐Tethys oceanic plate beneath the western Sibumasu Terrane. The Paleocene biotite granite likely resulted from asthenospheric upwelling caused by the rollback of the Neo‐Tethys oceanic plate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resource Geology
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rge.70024
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geochemical and Geochronological Constraints on the Petrogenesis and Tectonic Evolution of Li‐Pegmatites and Granites in Phang Nga and Phuket, Southern Thailand

Ladda Tangwattananukul, Mayuko Fukuyama, Dolnapha Phrairoj
Resource Geology
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Geochemical and Geochronological Constraints on the Petrogenesis and Tectonic Evolution of Li‐Pegmatites and Granites in Phang Nga and Phuket, Southern Thailand

Ladda Tangwattananukul, Mayuko Fukuyama, Dolnapha Phrairoj
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lepidolite‐bearing pegmatite, recently recognized as a major lithium (Li) resource, is exposed in Phang Nga, southern Thailand. This study investigates the geological relationships between Li‐pegmatites and granitic rocks and their formation processes within the tectonic evolution of the study area, using petrological, geochemical, and geochronological data. The granitic rocks in the study area are classified into three types: I‐type biotite granite, both I‐ and S‐type biotite–muscovite granite, and S‐type tourmaline granite. The Li‐pegmatite shows S‐type characteristics with peraluminous features. The primitive mantle‐normalized spider diagram of Li‐pegmatite and tourmaline granite reveals similar patterns, with enrichment in large‐ion lithophile elements (e.g., Cs, Rb, Li, and U) and depletion in Ba, Nb, and Sr, suggesting that the Li‐pegmatite evolved from a highly fractionated tourmaline granitic melt. Zircon U–Pb dating of the granites indicates three main magmatic events: Late Triassic biotite granite and tourmaline granite (216–214 Ma), Late Cretaceous biotite–muscovite granite and tourmaline granite (83–81 Ma), and Paleocene biotite granite (60–58 Ma). The cassiterite U–Pb ages of Li‐pegmatites are 81 and 69 Ma, which are coeval with the Late Cretaceous tourmaline granite. Newly found Late Triassic granites in the Western Granitoid Belt suggest that the Triassic granitic magmatism of the Central Granitoid Belt may extend further into southern Thailand than previously known. The formation of the Late Triassic biotite granite and tourmaline granite is related to the collision events between the Sibumasu and Indochina Terranes following the closure of the Paleo‐Tethys Ocean. Subsequently, during the Late Cretaceous, biotite–muscovite granite, tourmaline granite, and associated Li‐pegmatites formed due to the West Burma–Sibumasu collision and the subduction of the Neo‐Tethys oceanic plate beneath the western Sibumasu Terrane. The Paleocene biotite granite likely resulted from asthenospheric upwelling caused by the rollback of the Neo‐Tethys oceanic plate.

Resource GeologyVol. 76(1)
Kasetsart University (TH), Akita University (JP), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.