Representation meets optimization: Training PINNs and PIKANs for gray-box discovery in systems pharmacology

Physics-Informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (PIKANs) have been gaining attention as an effective counterpart to the original multilayer perceptron-based Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). Both representation models can address inverse problems and facilitate gray-box system identification. However, a comprehensive understanding of their performance in terms of accuracy and speed remains underexplored. In particular, we introduce a modified PIKAN architecture, tanh-cPIKAN, which is based on Chebyshev polynomials for parametrization of the univariate functions with an extra nonlinearity for enhanced performance. We then present a systematic investigation of how the choices of optimizer, representation, and training configuration influence the performance of PINNs and PIKANs in the context of systems pharmacology modeling. We benchmark a wide range of optimizers using simple but representative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. We use the new Optax library [1] as well as a new class of self-scaled optimizers developed in Optimistix library [2] to identify the most effective combinations for learning gray-boxes under ill-posed, non-unique, and data-sparse conditions. We examine the influence of model architecture (MLP vs. KAN), numerical precision (single vs. double), the need for warm-up phases for second-order methods, and sensitivity to the initial learning rate. We also assess the optimizer scalability for larger models and analyze the trade-offs introduced by JAX in terms of computational efficiency and numerical accuracy. Using two representative systems pharmacology examples, a pharmacokinetics model and a chemotherapy drug response model, we offer practical guidance on selecting optimizers and representation models/architectures for robust and efficient gray-box discovery. Our findings provide actionable insights for improving the training of physics-informed networks in systems pharmacology, systems biology, and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111393
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representation meets optimization: Training PINNs and PIKANs for gray-box discovery in systems pharmacology

George Em Karniadakis, Nazanin Ahmadi Daryakenari, Khemraj Shukla
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Representation meets optimization: Training PINNs and PIKANs for gray-box discovery in systems pharmacology

George Em Karniadakis, Nazanin Ahmadi Daryakenari, Khemraj Shukla
article en

Abstract

Physics-Informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (PIKANs) have been gaining attention as an effective counterpart to the original multilayer perceptron-based Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). Both representation models can address inverse problems and facilitate gray-box system identification. However, a comprehensive understanding of their performance in terms of accuracy and speed remains underexplored. In particular, we introduce a modified PIKAN architecture, tanh-cPIKAN, which is based on Chebyshev polynomials for parametrization of the univariate functions with an extra nonlinearity for enhanced performance. We then present a systematic investigation of how the choices of optimizer, representation, and training configuration influence the performance of PINNs and PIKANs in the context of systems pharmacology modeling. We benchmark a wide range of optimizers using simple but representative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. We use the new Optax library [1] as well as a new class of self-scaled optimizers developed in Optimistix library [2] to identify the most effective combinations for learning gray-boxes under ill-posed, non-unique, and data-sparse conditions. We examine the influence of model architecture (MLP vs. KAN), numerical precision (single vs. double), the need for warm-up phases for second-order methods, and sensitivity to the initial learning rate. We also assess the optimizer scalability for larger models and analyze the trade-offs introduced by JAX in terms of computational efficiency and numerical accuracy. Using two representative systems pharmacology examples, a pharmacokinetics model and a chemotherapy drug response model, we offer practical guidance on selecting optimizers and representation models/architectures for robust and efficient gray-box discovery. Our findings provide actionable insights for improving the training of physics-informed networks in systems pharmacology, systems biology, and beyond.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 201
Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.