The modulatory effects of design-related and clinical factors in neural drug cue reactivity: An ALE meta-analysis

Drug cue reactivity (DCR) is the most widely applied fMRI task in addiction neuroscience, yet its translational potential remains limited by unresolved methodological and clinical heterogeneity. In this systematic review and activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of 92 fMRI studies comprising 3647 participants, we examined how design-related factors (fMRI design, control condition valence, stimulus matching) and clinical factors (treatment compliance, drug use severity, common substance classes) shape neural DCR. Beyond identifying the core DCR pattern and its meta-analytic connectivity profiles, we conducted contrast analyses and penalised logistic regression to test whether these factors predicted regional replicability. Our results revealed that both design-related and clinical factors exert systematic modulatory influences. Default-mode network (DMN) regions dominated the core DCR pattern, yet anterior DMN contributions declined with increasing drug use severity. Conversely, amygdala involvement was more frequently observed in severe drug use and in substance classes other than alcohol and nicotine. Treatment-compliant samples showed heightened DCR in superior parietal regions. Importantly, temporo-occipital and fusiform activations were consistently linked to insufficiently matched task designs, revealing that the literature is densely interspersed with visual confounds. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that heterogeneity in task design and clinical characteristics systematically shapes neural DCR. They also illustrate the promise of extending beyond prevailing conditioning accounts toward models that emphasise context, motivation, and value-based encoding. We propose that advancing the translational utility of DCR will depend on rigorous task validation and design, consistent reporting standards, and theoretical frameworks expansive enough to embrace the multifaceted processes reflected in DCR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106537
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The modulatory effects of design-related and clinical factors in neural drug cue reactivity: An ALE meta-analysis

Markus Muehlhan, Maximilian Fascher, Henriette Thomsen
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

The modulatory effects of design-related and clinical factors in neural drug cue reactivity: An ALE meta-analysis

Markus Muehlhan, Maximilian Fascher, Henriette Thomsen
article en

Abstract

Drug cue reactivity (DCR) is the most widely applied fMRI task in addiction neuroscience, yet its translational potential remains limited by unresolved methodological and clinical heterogeneity. In this systematic review and activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of 92 fMRI studies comprising 3647 participants, we examined how design-related factors (fMRI design, control condition valence, stimulus matching) and clinical factors (treatment compliance, drug use severity, common substance classes) shape neural DCR. Beyond identifying the core DCR pattern and its meta-analytic connectivity profiles, we conducted contrast analyses and penalised logistic regression to test whether these factors predicted regional replicability. Our results revealed that both design-related and clinical factors exert systematic modulatory influences. Default-mode network (DMN) regions dominated the core DCR pattern, yet anterior DMN contributions declined with increasing drug use severity. Conversely, amygdala involvement was more frequently observed in severe drug use and in substance classes other than alcohol and nicotine. Treatment-compliant samples showed heightened DCR in superior parietal regions. Importantly, temporo-occipital and fusiform activations were consistently linked to insufficiently matched task designs, revealing that the literature is densely interspersed with visual confounds. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that heterogeneity in task design and clinical characteristics systematically shapes neural DCR. They also illustrate the promise of extending beyond prevailing conditioning accounts toward models that emphasise context, motivation, and value-based encoding. We propose that advancing the translational utility of DCR will depend on rigorous task validation and design, consistent reporting standards, and theoretical frameworks expansive enough to embrace the multifaceted processes reflected in DCR.

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsVol. 181
MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.