Patient outcome prognosis for external beam radiation therapy using CBCT-based radiomics: a systematic review

<i>Objective</i>. This review investigates the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in conjunction with radiomics for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in cancer treatment. CBCT, which provides high-resolution, volumetric images, offers a promising tool for precision treatment delivery. By integrating radiomics and quantitative features extracted from CBCT, this review explores potential advancements in tumor characterization, treatment planning, and monitoring treatment responses in personalized cancer therapy.<i>Approach</i>. We conducted this systematic review using the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) framework. This study focused on CBCT-only radiomics applications, examining publications in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria were strictly peer-reviewed journal articles, resulting in 29 studies being selected for analysis. These studies were divided into two main categories: (1) method development for treatment outcome prediction; (2) verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) for CBCT-based radiomics.<i>Main Results</i>. The literature encompasses a range of investigations into CBCT-based radiomics for EBRT, covering different cancer types such as head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, esophageal squamous cell cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, and rectal cancer. These studies used radiomics to predict outcomes including tumor response, local failure, tissue toxicity, and patient survival. VVUQ studies addressed the robustness and reproducibility of radiomic features. Furthermore, the emerging field of 4D-CBCT radiomics shows potential in improving image quality.<i>Significance</i>. CBCT-based radiomics presents a promising advancement in personalized radiotherapy, allowing for enhanced cancer prognosis and treatment adaptation. However, challenges of imaging quality and acquisition need to be addressed to ensure consistency and reliability. Future research should focus on standardizing imaging protocols and incorporating multi-institutional collaborations to further validate the clinical applicability of CBCT-based radiomics. Integration of this technology can potentially induce a paradigm shift in personalized cancer radiotherapy. New technologies promise to make CBCT even more valuable in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae308b
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient outcome prognosis for external beam radiation therapy using CBCT-based radiomics: a systematic review

Richard L. J. Qiu, Tonghe Wang, Xiaofeng Yang, Chih-Wei Chang
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Patient outcome prognosis for external beam radiation therapy using CBCT-based radiomics: a systematic review

Richard L. J. Qiu, Tonghe Wang, Xiaofeng Yang, Chih-Wei Chang
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. This review investigates the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in conjunction with radiomics for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in cancer treatment. CBCT, which provides high-resolution, volumetric images, offers a promising tool for precision treatment delivery. By integrating radiomics and quantitative features extracted from CBCT, this review explores potential advancements in tumor characterization, treatment planning, and monitoring treatment responses in personalized cancer therapy.<i>Approach</i>. We conducted this systematic review using the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) framework. This study focused on CBCT-only radiomics applications, examining publications in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria were strictly peer-reviewed journal articles, resulting in 29 studies being selected for analysis. These studies were divided into two main categories: (1) method development for treatment outcome prediction; (2) verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) for CBCT-based radiomics.<i>Main Results</i>. The literature encompasses a range of investigations into CBCT-based radiomics for EBRT, covering different cancer types such as head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, esophageal squamous cell cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, and rectal cancer. These studies used radiomics to predict outcomes including tumor response, local failure, tissue toxicity, and patient survival. VVUQ studies addressed the robustness and reproducibility of radiomic features. Furthermore, the emerging field of 4D-CBCT radiomics shows potential in improving image quality.<i>Significance</i>. CBCT-based radiomics presents a promising advancement in personalized radiotherapy, allowing for enhanced cancer prognosis and treatment adaptation. However, challenges of imaging quality and acquisition need to be addressed to ensure consistency and reliability. Future research should focus on standardizing imaging protocols and incorporating multi-institutional collaborations to further validate the clinical applicability of CBCT-based radiomics. Integration of this technology can potentially induce a paradigm shift in personalized cancer radiotherapy. New technologies promise to make CBCT even more valuable in the future.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 12(1)
Boston University (US), University of Iowa (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Emory University (US), Cleveland Foundation (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), National Cancer Institute (MY), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.