Psychological and Functional Assessment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures and their Return to Sports

Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Achilles Tendon Ruptures (ATR) sustained in sport has only previously been investigated in an athletic population. Our aim in this study was to understand the psychology and function of ATR and their return to sport. Methods: A historic cohort study was completed in our specialist Achilles clinic over 3 years in patients who had sustained an ATR when participating in sport in a non-athletic population. Patients completed ATRS and I-PRRS. Results: Out of 142 patients with ATR sustained during sport, a total of 73 patients had data available for further analysis beyond 12 months. There were 17 (23.29%) who returned to same sport at the same level, 13 (17.81%) returned to same sport at different level, 11 (15.07%) who returned to different sport and 43.84% who did not return to sport. The I-PRRS and ATRS was significantly lower in the patients who did not return to sport (p <.001 and .003). There was significant correlation between the I-PRRS and ATRS. The most common reason given for not returning to sport was fear of reinjury (41.30%), followed by pain/stiffness (26.09%) and life circumstance (13.04%). Conclusion: Return to sport following ATR in a non athletic population was low. The most common reason for failure to return to sport was psychological, however the functional scores and psychological scores displayed significant correlation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425s00403
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological and Functional Assessment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures and their Return to Sports

ANDY MOLLOY, Glenn Wei Leong Tan, Ashka Moothoosamy, Lyndon Mason et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

Psychological and Functional Assessment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures and their Return to Sports

ANDY MOLLOY, Glenn Wei Leong Tan, Ashka Moothoosamy, Lyndon Mason, Mansha Bhiryani, Rahul Mohan Kumar, Abdul-Rahman Gomaa, Benjamin Jones, Carzan Al-shareefi, Nikesh Someswaran, Paula Goudie, Daniel Scarffe, Junaid Aamir
article en

Abstract

Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Achilles Tendon Ruptures (ATR) sustained in sport has only previously been investigated in an athletic population. Our aim in this study was to understand the psychology and function of ATR and their return to sport. Methods: A historic cohort study was completed in our specialist Achilles clinic over 3 years in patients who had sustained an ATR when participating in sport in a non-athletic population. Patients completed ATRS and I-PRRS. Results: Out of 142 patients with ATR sustained during sport, a total of 73 patients had data available for further analysis beyond 12 months. There were 17 (23.29%) who returned to same sport at the same level, 13 (17.81%) returned to same sport at different level, 11 (15.07%) who returned to different sport and 43.84% who did not return to sport. The I-PRRS and ATRS was significantly lower in the patients who did not return to sport (p <.001 and .003). There was significant correlation between the I-PRRS and ATRS. The most common reason given for not returning to sport was fear of reinjury (41.30%), followed by pain/stiffness (26.09%) and life circumstance (13.04%). Conclusion: Return to sport following ATR in a non athletic population was low. The most common reason for failure to return to sport was psychological, however the functional scores and psychological scores displayed significant correlation.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.