Teaching introductory programming in top universities: A global study of languages, paradigms, assessment, and AI

This study examines the first two introductory computer science courses (CS1 and CS2) at the world's top universities, focusing on the choice of programming languages and paradigms, assessment types and weights, and policies regarding student use of AI tools. Data were compiled from 150 programming courses across 83 institutions ranked in the Shanghai 2023 Global Ranking of Academic Subjects for Computer Science & Engineering. The analysis reveals that the prevailing languages are Python in CS1 (32.5%) and Java in CS2 (56.7%). Typical transitions from CS1 to CS2 involve moving from Python or C to Java. There are some regional preferences: Asian institutions favor lower-level languages like C and C++, whereas European universities explore functional programming languages like Haskell. Regarding programming paradigms, CS1 emphasizes imperative approaches, sometimes introducing object-oriented concepts later in the course, while CS2 consolidates object-oriented programming. However, some CS1 courses adopt a functional paradigm. Course assessments are typically divided into several categories, with a preference for exams and various types of continuous assessments. However, there is also significant use of projects, quizzes, and labs. Examinations usually have the highest weight in the final grade. Course-level policies on students' use of generative AI tools reveal very different approaches, from complete prohibition to active encouragement. These findings offer valuable insights into how leading universities approach programming education in a multidimensional view that includes languages, paradigms, assessments, and AI tools policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Languages
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cola.2025.101384
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching introductory programming in top universities: A global study of languages, paradigms, assessment, and AI

Vítor Mendonça, André Silva Moreira, Carlos R. Cunha, João Pedro Gomes et al.
Journal of Computer Languages
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Teaching introductory programming in top universities: A global study of languages, paradigms, assessment, and AI

Vítor Mendonça, André Silva Moreira, Carlos R. Cunha, João Pedro Gomes, Redney Monteiro, Anabela Pinho
article en

Abstract

This study examines the first two introductory computer science courses (CS1 and CS2) at the world's top universities, focusing on the choice of programming languages and paradigms, assessment types and weights, and policies regarding student use of AI tools. Data were compiled from 150 programming courses across 83 institutions ranked in the Shanghai 2023 Global Ranking of Academic Subjects for Computer Science & Engineering. The analysis reveals that the prevailing languages are Python in CS1 (32.5%) and Java in CS2 (56.7%). Typical transitions from CS1 to CS2 involve moving from Python or C to Java. There are some regional preferences: Asian institutions favor lower-level languages like C and C++, whereas European universities explore functional programming languages like Haskell. Regarding programming paradigms, CS1 emphasizes imperative approaches, sometimes introducing object-oriented concepts later in the course, while CS2 consolidates object-oriented programming. However, some CS1 courses adopt a functional paradigm. Course assessments are typically divided into several categories, with a preference for exams and various types of continuous assessments. However, there is also significant use of projects, quizzes, and labs. Examinations usually have the highest weight in the final grade. Course-level policies on students' use of generative AI tools reveal very different approaches, from complete prohibition to active encouragement. These findings offer valuable insights into how leading universities approach programming education in a multidimensional view that includes languages, paradigms, assessments, and AI tools policies.

Journal of Computer LanguagesVol. 86
Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT), Research Centre in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics (PT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.