On what can or cannot influence the small amplitude oscillations of a gas bubble

The analysis presented in this paper concerns the impact of different physical quantities and conditions on the small amplitude oscillations of a single gas bubble immersed in a liquid, in the presence of an acoustic forcing pressure. Namely, effects related to the nature of the gas and its modeling, to the boundary conditions on the bubble wall, and to the size and shape of the bubble itself are studied and compared. The solutions are always determined analytically. The polytropic index and the damping coefficient are not assigned a priori but are determined from gas dynamics equations of Navier–Stokes–Fourier, and rational extended thermodynamics type. This preliminary approach facilitates the distinction between essential features and reasonable possible simplifications, also with a view to extending the model to nonlinear regimes. Furthermore, the results obtained could suggest how to prescribe the polytropic index more accurately when the gas dynamics in the bubble are reduced to a simple polytropic process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0305369
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On what can or cannot influence the small amplitude oscillations of a gas bubble

Francesca Brini, Leonardo Seccia
Physics of Fluids
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
article

On what can or cannot influence the small amplitude oscillations of a gas bubble

Francesca Brini, Leonardo Seccia
article en

Abstract

The analysis presented in this paper concerns the impact of different physical quantities and conditions on the small amplitude oscillations of a single gas bubble immersed in a liquid, in the presence of an acoustic forcing pressure. Namely, effects related to the nature of the gas and its modeling, to the boundary conditions on the bubble wall, and to the size and shape of the bubble itself are studied and compared. The solutions are always determined analytically. The polytropic index and the damping coefficient are not assigned a priori but are determined from gas dynamics equations of Navier–Stokes–Fourier, and rational extended thermodynamics type. This preliminary approach facilitates the distinction between essential features and reasonable possible simplifications, also with a view to extending the model to nonlinear regimes. Furthermore, the results obtained could suggest how to prescribe the polytropic index more accurately when the gas dynamics in the bubble are reduced to a simple polytropic process.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(12)
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.