AIJ guidelines on the applications of large-eddy simulation to pedestrian wind environment: Recommendations and validation benchmarks

This study introduces recent efforts of the Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) to develop guidelines for large-eddy simulation (LES) of pedestrian wind environments (PWEs). Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models have been widely used for predicting urban wind environments following best practice guidelines (BPGs) by Franke et al. [Int J Environ Pollut 44 , 1–4 (2011)] and Tominaga et al. [J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96 (10–11), 1749–1761 (2008)]. Although RANS models can predict mean wind velocity and some turbulence statistics based on empirical assumptions, LES provides higher accuracy in resolving transient turbulence structures larger than the grid scale. With increasing urbanization, understanding instantaneous complex wind and wind-related phenomena around buildings is essential for ensuring pedestrian wind comfort and safety. However, LES applications face challenges owing to a lack of BPGs. This study outlines key recommendations for simulation setups and post-processing, including domain size, building modeling, grid generation, boundary conditions, turbulence modeling, discretization, convergence criteria, and reliability evaluation. Additionally, new benchmark cases are provided to support validation for PWEs. The AIJ working group systematically evaluated LES performance across urban scenarios to ensure practical applicability while balancing computational costs. These guidelines aim to enhance prediction reliability, thereby contributing to the standardization of LES applications for PWE and advancement of computational wind engineering. • The AIJ working group introduces LES guidelines for pedestrian wind environments. • The guidelines aim to describe key recommendations for simulation setups and post-processing. • The AIJ working group systematically evaluated the LES performance across various benchmarks. • Additional experimental cases are presented as benchmarks for verification and validation. • The database of appropriate inflow turbulence for several benchmarks is shared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106321
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AIJ guidelines on the applications of large-eddy simulation to pedestrian wind environment: Recommendations and validation benchmarks

Takamasa Hasama, Yoshihide Tominaga, Keigo Nakajima, Masashi Imano et al.
1 citations
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Wind and Air Flow Studies
0.80
article

AIJ guidelines on the applications of large-eddy simulation to pedestrian wind environment: Recommendations and validation benchmarks

Takamasa Hasama, Yoshihide Tominaga, Keigo Nakajima, Masashi Imano, Hideki Kikumoto, Hiroki Ono, Naoki Ikegaya, Ryuichiro Yoshie, Yuichi Tabata, Tsubasa Okaze, Takeshi Kishida, Keisuke Nakao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study introduces recent efforts of the Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) to develop guidelines for large-eddy simulation (LES) of pedestrian wind environments (PWEs). Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models have been widely used for predicting urban wind environments following best practice guidelines (BPGs) by Franke et al. [Int J Environ Pollut 44 , 1–4 (2011)] and Tominaga et al. [J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96 (10–11), 1749–1761 (2008)]. Although RANS models can predict mean wind velocity and some turbulence statistics based on empirical assumptions, LES provides higher accuracy in resolving transient turbulence structures larger than the grid scale. With increasing urbanization, understanding instantaneous complex wind and wind-related phenomena around buildings is essential for ensuring pedestrian wind comfort and safety. However, LES applications face challenges owing to a lack of BPGs. This study outlines key recommendations for simulation setups and post-processing, including domain size, building modeling, grid generation, boundary conditions, turbulence modeling, discretization, convergence criteria, and reliability evaluation. Additionally, new benchmark cases are provided to support validation for PWEs. The AIJ working group systematically evaluated LES performance across urban scenarios to ensure practical applicability while balancing computational costs. These guidelines aim to enhance prediction reliability, thereby contributing to the standardization of LES applications for PWE and advancement of computational wind engineering. • The AIJ working group introduces LES guidelines for pedestrian wind environments. • The guidelines aim to describe key recommendations for simulation setups and post-processing. • The AIJ working group systematically evaluated the LES performance across various benchmarks. • Additional experimental cases are presented as benchmarks for verification and validation. • The database of appropriate inflow turbulence for several benchmarks is shared.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial AerodynamicsVol. 269
Obayashi (Japan) (JP), Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (JP), Kyushu University (JP), Kajima Corporation (Japan) (JP), Tokyo Polytechnic University (JP), Niigata Institute of Technology (JP), Tokyo College of Environment (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.