Somatosensory realignment following single and dual force-field adaptation

Evidence that adaptive motor learning coincides with a realignment of somatosensory perception has led to hypotheses that a shared mechanism underlies both processes. This implies that these two phenomena should exhibit similar properties. However, studies of somatosensory realignment with visuomotor adaptation have shown mixed support, possibly due to a confounding coactivation of sensory prediction errors and multisensory integration. Although the former is thought to drive adaptation, both processes may contribute to somatosensory realignment. Here, we examined somatosensory realignment following force-field adaptation, which is not confounded by multisensory integration. Across two experiments, we tested whether somatosensory realignment mimics three canonical properties of adaptation in this paradigm. Our first experiment examined whether sensory realignment (for the perception of movement or static position) correlated with adaptation across individuals and generalized beyond the trained reach direction. The results showed that force-field adaptation coincided with a selective realignment of somatosensory perception of movement in the direction of the perturbing force, but this realignment did not correlate with the magnitude of adaptation or generalize beyond the reach direction of the adaptation task. In a second experiment, we tested whether context-dependent dual adaptation to opposing force-field perturbations coincides with a context-dependent dual realignment of somatosensory perception. The results showed no evidence of context-dependent somatosensory realignment after dual adaptation. Overall, our results indicate that somatosensory realignment and adaptation exhibit different properties and are therefore unlikely to rely on the same underlying mechanism, although realignment does display some coherence with the nature of the perturbation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study is the first to demonstrate a dissociation in the realignment of somatosensory perceptions of static position and movement following adaptation to novel forces in the upper limb. By assessing whether perceptual realignment following force-field adaptation exhibits two canonical properties of this type of motor learning-i.e., generalization to nearby movement directions and context dependence-this study constitutes a key test of theories positing a shared mechanism underlying the motor and perceptual processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00355.2025
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Somatosensory realignment following single and dual force-field adaptation

Amanda S. Therrien, Dylan S. Zangakis, Aaron L. Wong
Journal of Neurophysiology
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Somatosensory realignment following single and dual force-field adaptation

Amanda S. Therrien, Dylan S. Zangakis, Aaron L. Wong
article en

Abstract

Evidence that adaptive motor learning coincides with a realignment of somatosensory perception has led to hypotheses that a shared mechanism underlies both processes. This implies that these two phenomena should exhibit similar properties. However, studies of somatosensory realignment with visuomotor adaptation have shown mixed support, possibly due to a confounding coactivation of sensory prediction errors and multisensory integration. Although the former is thought to drive adaptation, both processes may contribute to somatosensory realignment. Here, we examined somatosensory realignment following force-field adaptation, which is not confounded by multisensory integration. Across two experiments, we tested whether somatosensory realignment mimics three canonical properties of adaptation in this paradigm. Our first experiment examined whether sensory realignment (for the perception of movement or static position) correlated with adaptation across individuals and generalized beyond the trained reach direction. The results showed that force-field adaptation coincided with a selective realignment of somatosensory perception of movement in the direction of the perturbing force, but this realignment did not correlate with the magnitude of adaptation or generalize beyond the reach direction of the adaptation task. In a second experiment, we tested whether context-dependent dual adaptation to opposing force-field perturbations coincides with a context-dependent dual realignment of somatosensory perception. The results showed no evidence of context-dependent somatosensory realignment after dual adaptation. Overall, our results indicate that somatosensory realignment and adaptation exhibit different properties and are therefore unlikely to rely on the same underlying mechanism, although realignment does display some coherence with the nature of the perturbation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study is the first to demonstrate a dissociation in the realignment of somatosensory perceptions of static position and movement following adaptation to novel forces in the upper limb. By assessing whether perceptual realignment following force-field adaptation exhibits two canonical properties of this type of motor learning-i.e., generalization to nearby movement directions and context dependence-this study constitutes a key test of theories positing a shared mechanism underlying the motor and perceptual processes.

Journal of NeurophysiologyVol. 135(1)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.