Shoulder Instability in the U.S. Military: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Operative Management, and Outcomes

<b>Background:</b> Shoulder instability imposes a substantial burden in U.S. military populations, yet epidemiology and outcomes reporting is heterogeneous. This study aims to quantify the epidemiology of shoulder instability among U.S. active-duty servicemembers and to report operative management patterns and outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and SPORTDiscus through 1 August 2025. Eligible studies enrolled U.S. active-duty servicemembers with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of instability. After a single comprehensive search with uniform inclusion criteria, studies were assigned to two prespecified cohorts: (1) epidemiology (incidence, directionality, risk factors) and (2) operative management/outcomes (procedure distribution, failure, complications, return to duty [RTD] and return to sport [RTS]). Incidence was pooled as a person-years-weighted fixed-effect estimate; directionality proportions were meta-analyzed with random-effects (logit-transformed) models among patient-level, unidirectional cases. <b>Results:</b> Forty-nine studies were included (epidemiology, <i>n</i> = 8; outcomes, <i>n</i> = 41). Three epidemiologic datasets (42,310 events; 20,472,363 person-years) yielded a pooled military incidence of 2.07 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 2.05-2.09). Among unidirectional cases (<i>n</i> = 916 shoulders), anterior instability comprised 83.9% (95% CI, 70.5-91.9) and posterior the remaining 16.1% (95% CI, 8.1-29.5). Outcome series most commonly reported arthroscopic Bankart repair (<i>n</i> = 933 shoulders), bony augmentation (e.g., Latarjet/Bristow; <i>n</i> = 700), posterior labral repair (<i>n</i> = 649), combined repairs (<i>n</i> = 511), and open Bankart (<i>n</i> = 442). Weighted mean failure ranged 4.7-23.6%; complications 5.2-10.9%; and reoperations 5.3-17.7%. RTD ranged 50.0-84.7% and RTS 4.8-75.0%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Shoulder instability in U.S. servicemembers occurs at rates exceeding population-based civilian estimates, with a relatively greater share of posterior and combined patterns. Operative outcomes vary substantially across procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010110
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shoulder Instability in the U.S. Military: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Operative Management, and Outcomes

Nata Parnes, Jonna Peterson, John P. Scanaliato, Alexis B. Sandler et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Shoulder Instability in the U.S. Military: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Operative Management, and Outcomes

Nata Parnes, Jonna Peterson, John P. Scanaliato, Alexis B. Sandler, Dane Salazar, Hunter Czajkowski, Nicholas M. Brown, John R. Tyler
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Shoulder instability imposes a substantial burden in U.S. military populations, yet epidemiology and outcomes reporting is heterogeneous. This study aims to quantify the epidemiology of shoulder instability among U.S. active-duty servicemembers and to report operative management patterns and outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and SPORTDiscus through 1 August 2025. Eligible studies enrolled U.S. active-duty servicemembers with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of instability. After a single comprehensive search with uniform inclusion criteria, studies were assigned to two prespecified cohorts: (1) epidemiology (incidence, directionality, risk factors) and (2) operative management/outcomes (procedure distribution, failure, complications, return to duty [RTD] and return to sport [RTS]). Incidence was pooled as a person-years-weighted fixed-effect estimate; directionality proportions were meta-analyzed with random-effects (logit-transformed) models among patient-level, unidirectional cases. <b>Results:</b> Forty-nine studies were included (epidemiology, <i>n</i> = 8; outcomes, <i>n</i> = 41). Three epidemiologic datasets (42,310 events; 20,472,363 person-years) yielded a pooled military incidence of 2.07 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 2.05-2.09). Among unidirectional cases (<i>n</i> = 916 shoulders), anterior instability comprised 83.9% (95% CI, 70.5-91.9) and posterior the remaining 16.1% (95% CI, 8.1-29.5). Outcome series most commonly reported arthroscopic Bankart repair (<i>n</i> = 933 shoulders), bony augmentation (e.g., Latarjet/Bristow; <i>n</i> = 700), posterior labral repair (<i>n</i> = 649), combined repairs (<i>n</i> = 511), and open Bankart (<i>n</i> = 442). Weighted mean failure ranged 4.7-23.6%; complications 5.2-10.9%; and reoperations 5.3-17.7%. RTD ranged 50.0-84.7% and RTS 4.8-75.0%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Shoulder instability in U.S. servicemembers occurs at rates exceeding population-based civilian estimates, with a relatively greater share of posterior and combined patterns. Operative outcomes vary substantially across procedures.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(1)
Texas Tech University (US), William Beaumont Army Medical Center (US), Carthage College (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), Loyola Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.