Are we ready to plan for synergies? System Integration Impact Assessment in the Austrian energy system modelling community

Integrated solutions across processes, sectors, and systems can deliver value that exceeds the sum of their parts. Sector coupling, for example, is increasingly recognized as a key enabler for balancing intermittent renewable electricity, while creating new interdependencies and systemic risks. Yet, the capacity of energy system models to anticipate such synergies and trade-offs remains uneven. This article presents a structured review of Austria's energy system modelling landscape, mapping over 800 publications from 54 research groups. We classify modelling capacities across technical, temporal, and spatial integration dimensions and identify significant gaps in areas such as bioenergy, circularity, and extreme event modelling, alongside promising advances in heating networks, electricity sector coupling, and energy communities. The growing attention to operational flexibility in long-term models offers a window of opportunity to better anticipate shocks, structural breaks, and resilience considerations. The openly shared integration fitness tables derived from this review aim to foster collaboration and capacity-building across modelling silos. We argue that advancing System Integration Impact Assessment requires uncertainty-aware modelling frameworks capable of capturing synergies, trade-offs, and systemic risks. Embracing uncertainty rather than reducing it can help design transformation pathways that are not only sustainable but also robust and flexible. Ultimately, this shift could bring together environmental and economic efficiency, safety, and security into a shared paradigm, elevating sustainable development toward reliable development. • System integration impacts remain underrepresented in energy system modelling • Flexibility enables systems to embrace uncertain trends, variabilities, and extremes • Modelling readiness varies across integration dimensions and uncertainty types • Energy planning must align with disaster risk management for more robust pathways • Austrian research group lookup tables foster collaboration between modelling silos

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104505
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are we ready to plan for synergies? System Integration Impact Assessment in the Austrian energy system modelling community

F. Kraxner, Sebastian Wehrle, Shubham Tiwari, Michael Harasek et al.
1 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
0.73
article

Are we ready to plan for synergies? System Integration Impact Assessment in the Austrian energy system modelling community

F. Kraxner, Sebastian Wehrle, Shubham Tiwari, Michael Harasek, Hanna Breunig, Johannes Schmidt, Daniela Thrän, Fabian Schipfer, Neda Asasian Kolur, Danial Esmaeili Aliabadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Integrated solutions across processes, sectors, and systems can deliver value that exceeds the sum of their parts. Sector coupling, for example, is increasingly recognized as a key enabler for balancing intermittent renewable electricity, while creating new interdependencies and systemic risks. Yet, the capacity of energy system models to anticipate such synergies and trade-offs remains uneven. This article presents a structured review of Austria's energy system modelling landscape, mapping over 800 publications from 54 research groups. We classify modelling capacities across technical, temporal, and spatial integration dimensions and identify significant gaps in areas such as bioenergy, circularity, and extreme event modelling, alongside promising advances in heating networks, electricity sector coupling, and energy communities. The growing attention to operational flexibility in long-term models offers a window of opportunity to better anticipate shocks, structural breaks, and resilience considerations. The openly shared integration fitness tables derived from this review aim to foster collaboration and capacity-building across modelling silos. We argue that advancing System Integration Impact Assessment requires uncertainty-aware modelling frameworks capable of capturing synergies, trade-offs, and systemic risks. Embracing uncertainty rather than reducing it can help design transformation pathways that are not only sustainable but also robust and flexible. Ultimately, this shift could bring together environmental and economic efficiency, safety, and security into a shared paradigm, elevating sustainable development toward reliable development. • System integration impacts remain underrepresented in energy system modelling • Flexibility enables systems to embrace uncertain trends, variabilities, and extremes • Modelling readiness varies across integration dimensions and uncertainty types • Energy planning must align with disaster risk management for more robust pathways • Austrian research group lookup tables foster collaboration between modelling silos

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 131
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), TU Wien (AT), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), BOKU University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.