Impact of Embodied Energy and Carbon on the Path to Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings

In recent decades, energy efficiency policies have increasingly focused on reducing buildings’ energy use and improving their performance. However, by overlooking the entire life cycle of a building, a considerable portion of its environmental impact has indeed been kept out of the process. As a result, even leading buildings that have advanced toward Zero-Energy status may not that as innocent as promised by evaluating environmental impacts during their whole life. Consequently, a logical method for achieving nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) involves implementing energy-efficient measures and proper materials throughout the entire life cycle of buildings. This paper is one of its first kinds that includes all building systems and materials embodied energy and cost to explore the possibility of creating nearly zero residential buildings through their life cycle. Life-cycle energy consumptions, life-cycle CO2 emissions and life-cycle cost of nZEB retrofit packages for a five-storey, 20-apartment residential building in Ankara, Turkey were evaluated. The methodology couples dynamic simulation (DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus) with an EN 15978-aligned boundary (A1–A5, B, C). The study highlights the critical role of both operational and embodied energy and carbon emissions in the pursuit of nZEBs. The best nZEB package reduces primary energy by ~55% and life-cycle CO2 by ~45% relative to the reference building over 50 years, while cost-optimal packages deliver 6–7% lower global cost. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of life cycle assessment in measuring building environmental impact, the utilization of renewable energy, and the optimization of building materials in reducing energy consumption and emissions, providing a sustainable and cost-efficient approach to residential building design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010087
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Embodied Energy and Carbon on the Path to Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings

Touraj Ashrafian, Nazanin Moazzen
1 citations
Sustainability
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Impact of Embodied Energy and Carbon on the Path to Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings

Touraj Ashrafian, Nazanin Moazzen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent decades, energy efficiency policies have increasingly focused on reducing buildings’ energy use and improving their performance. However, by overlooking the entire life cycle of a building, a considerable portion of its environmental impact has indeed been kept out of the process. As a result, even leading buildings that have advanced toward Zero-Energy status may not that as innocent as promised by evaluating environmental impacts during their whole life. Consequently, a logical method for achieving nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) involves implementing energy-efficient measures and proper materials throughout the entire life cycle of buildings. This paper is one of its first kinds that includes all building systems and materials embodied energy and cost to explore the possibility of creating nearly zero residential buildings through their life cycle. Life-cycle energy consumptions, life-cycle CO2 emissions and life-cycle cost of nZEB retrofit packages for a five-storey, 20-apartment residential building in Ankara, Turkey were evaluated. The methodology couples dynamic simulation (DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus) with an EN 15978-aligned boundary (A1–A5, B, C). The study highlights the critical role of both operational and embodied energy and carbon emissions in the pursuit of nZEBs. The best nZEB package reduces primary energy by ~55% and life-cycle CO2 by ~45% relative to the reference building over 50 years, while cost-optimal packages deliver 6–7% lower global cost. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of life cycle assessment in measuring building environmental impact, the utilization of renewable energy, and the optimization of building materials in reducing energy consumption and emissions, providing a sustainable and cost-efficient approach to residential building design.

SustainabilityVol. 18(1)
Northumbria University (GB), Teesside University (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.