Consumer‐Perceived Responsible Innovation: Scale Development and Its Influence on Adoption and Anticonsumption

ABSTRACT Responsible innovation (RI) seeks to align innovation processes with societal values and ethical principles. Understanding how consumers perceive RI is crucial, as innovation failures often arise from mismatches between managerial intentions and consumer expectations. This paper develops and validates a novel scale to measure consumer perception of responsible innovation (CPRI) through a multistep process grounded in the AIRR framework, anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness. First, an initial pool of 53 items was generated from multiple sources, including academic literature, existing scales, qualitative interviews, and AI‐assisted item generation. Second, expert evaluations refined this item pool. Third, a quantitative prestudy ( N = 242) reduced the scale to 20 items. Study 1 ( N = 240) further refined the scale to 16 items and confirmed its factor structure. Study 2 ( N = 326) confirmed the scale's robustness. Study 1 and Study 2 demonstrated the scale's predictive power for innovation adoption and how it is embedded within a nomological network. Study 3 ( N = 288) further established that CPRI influences anticonsumption behaviors significantly, such as voluntary simplicity‐based avoidance and boycotting. Study 4 ( N = 214) employed an experimental design to show that the CPRI dimensions are sensitive to manipulations and that CPRI mediates the impact of RI activities. The findings demonstrate reliability and validity of the CPRI scale across diverse innovation contexts, including AI image generator, cultured meat, robotaxis, and emotional support robots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70094
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer‐Perceived Responsible Innovation: Scale Development and Its Influence on Adoption and Anticonsumption

Stefan Hoffmann, Kristina Nickel, Susanne C. Liebermann, Carsten Schultz et al.
Psychology and Marketing
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Consumer‐Perceived Responsible Innovation: Scale Development and Its Influence on Adoption and Anticonsumption

Stefan Hoffmann, Kristina Nickel, Susanne C. Liebermann, Carsten Schultz, Christina Jobst
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Responsible innovation (RI) seeks to align innovation processes with societal values and ethical principles. Understanding how consumers perceive RI is crucial, as innovation failures often arise from mismatches between managerial intentions and consumer expectations. This paper develops and validates a novel scale to measure consumer perception of responsible innovation (CPRI) through a multistep process grounded in the AIRR framework, anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness. First, an initial pool of 53 items was generated from multiple sources, including academic literature, existing scales, qualitative interviews, and AI‐assisted item generation. Second, expert evaluations refined this item pool. Third, a quantitative prestudy ( N = 242) reduced the scale to 20 items. Study 1 ( N = 240) further refined the scale to 16 items and confirmed its factor structure. Study 2 ( N = 326) confirmed the scale's robustness. Study 1 and Study 2 demonstrated the scale's predictive power for innovation adoption and how it is embedded within a nomological network. Study 3 ( N = 288) further established that CPRI influences anticonsumption behaviors significantly, such as voluntary simplicity‐based avoidance and boycotting. Study 4 ( N = 214) employed an experimental design to show that the CPRI dimensions are sensitive to manipulations and that CPRI mediates the impact of RI activities. The findings demonstrate reliability and validity of the CPRI scale across diverse innovation contexts, including AI image generator, cultured meat, robotaxis, and emotional support robots.

Psychology and MarketingVol. 43(4)
Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), West Coast University of Applied Sciences (DE), Clinical Research Center Kiel (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.