Generalization bounds in hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models

Hybrid quantum-classical models aim to harness the strengths of both quantum computing and classical machine learning, but their practical potential remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop a unified mathematical framework for analyzing generalization in hybrid models, offering insight into how these systems learn from data. We establish a generalization bound of the form <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mover accent="true"> <a:mi mathvariant="script">O</a:mi> <a:mo>̃</a:mo> </a:mover> <a:mrow> <a:mo>(</a:mo> <a:mfrac> <a:msup> <a:mi>α</a:mi> <a:mi>k</a:mi> </a:msup> <a:msqrt> <a:mi>N</a:mi> </a:msqrt> </a:mfrac> <a:mrow> <a:mo>(</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mi>k</a:mi> <a:mfrac> <a:mn>3</a:mn> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:mfrac> </a:msup> <a:msqrt> <a:mrow> <a:mi>m</a:mi> <a:mi>n</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msqrt> <a:mo>+</a:mo> <a:msqrt> <a:mrow> <a:mi>T</a:mi> <a:mo form="prefix">log</a:mo> <a:mi>T</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msqrt> <a:mo>)</a:mo> </a:mrow> <a:mo>)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:mrow> </a:math> for <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mi>N</e:mi> </e:math> training data points, <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mi>T</f:mi> </f:math> trainable quantum gates, <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mi>n</g:mi> </g:math> -dimensional quantum circuit output, and <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mi>k</h:mi> </h:math> bounded linear layers <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:mrow> <i:mo>∥</i:mo> </i:mrow> <i:msub> <i:mi>F</i:mi> <i:mi>i</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:msub> <i:mrow> <i:mo>∥</i:mo> </i:mrow> <i:mi>F</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:mo>≤</i:mo> <i:mi>α</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:math> , where <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <j:mrow> <j:mi>i</j:mi> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mn>1</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mo>⋯</j:mo> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mi>k</j:mi> </j:mrow> </j:math> and <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <k:mrow> <k:mi>F</k:mi> <k:mo>∈</k:mo> <k:msup> <k:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</k:mi> <k:mrow> <k:mi>m</k:mi> <k:mo>×</k:mo> <k:mi>n</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:msup> </k:mrow> </k:math> interspersed with activation functions. This generalization bound decomposes into quantum and classical contributions, providing a theoretical framework to separate their influence and clarifying their interaction. Alongside the bound, we highlight conceptual limitations of applying classical statistical learning theory in the hybrid setting and suggest promising directions for future theoretical work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/6ckt-hlh8
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalization bounds in hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models

Alona Sakhnenko, Anonymous, Jeanette Miriam Lorenz, Amine Bentellis
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Generalization bounds in hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models

Alona Sakhnenko, Anonymous, Jeanette Miriam Lorenz, Amine Bentellis
article en

Abstract

Hybrid quantum-classical models aim to harness the strengths of both quantum computing and classical machine learning, but their practical potential remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop a unified mathematical framework for analyzing generalization in hybrid models, offering insight into how these systems learn from data. We establish a generalization bound of the form <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mover accent="true"> <a:mi mathvariant="script">O</a:mi> <a:mo>̃</a:mo> </a:mover> <a:mrow> <a:mo>(</a:mo> <a:mfrac> <a:msup> <a:mi>α</a:mi> <a:mi>k</a:mi> </a:msup> <a:msqrt> <a:mi>N</a:mi> </a:msqrt> </a:mfrac> <a:mrow> <a:mo>(</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mi>k</a:mi> <a:mfrac> <a:mn>3</a:mn> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:mfrac> </a:msup> <a:msqrt> <a:mrow> <a:mi>m</a:mi> <a:mi>n</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msqrt> <a:mo>+</a:mo> <a:msqrt> <a:mrow> <a:mi>T</a:mi> <a:mo form="prefix">log</a:mo> <a:mi>T</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msqrt> <a:mo>)</a:mo> </a:mrow> <a:mo>)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:mrow> </a:math> for <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mi>N</e:mi> </e:math> training data points, <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mi>T</f:mi> </f:math> trainable quantum gates, <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mi>n</g:mi> </g:math> -dimensional quantum circuit output, and <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mi>k</h:mi> </h:math> bounded linear layers <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:mrow> <i:mo>∥</i:mo> </i:mrow> <i:msub> <i:mi>F</i:mi> <i:mi>i</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:msub> <i:mrow> <i:mo>∥</i:mo> </i:mrow> <i:mi>F</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:mo>≤</i:mo> <i:mi>α</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:math> , where <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <j:mrow> <j:mi>i</j:mi> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mn>1</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mo>⋯</j:mo> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mi>k</j:mi> </j:mrow> </j:math> and <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <k:mrow> <k:mi>F</k:mi> <k:mo>∈</k:mo> <k:msup> <k:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</k:mi> <k:mrow> <k:mi>m</k:mi> <k:mo>×</k:mo> <k:mi>n</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:msup> </k:mrow> </k:math> interspersed with activation functions. This generalization bound decomposes into quantum and classical contributions, providing a theoretical framework to separate their influence and clarifying their interaction. Alongside the bound, we highlight conceptual limitations of applying classical statistical learning theory in the hybrid setting and suggest promising directions for future theoretical work.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 113(2)
Fraunhofer Institute for Cognitive Systems (DE), Gold Skin Care Center (US), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.