Donor age and type in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Strong effect in <scp>MDS</scp> , limited in <scp>AML</scp>

Donor age is an important factor influencing outcomes after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but its relevance across donor types and distinct disease biology in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains unclear. We analysed 320 patients with AML/MDS who underwent first allo-HSCT between 2016 and 2024. Donors were categorized as matched or mismatched and further stratified as young (<35 years) or old (≥35 years). Matched donors achieved superior survival compared with mismatched donors, while outcomes with young mismatched donors were intermediate and old mismatched donors were inferior driven by high non-relapse mortality. This effect was most evident in MDS, where young mismatched donors achieved survival similar to matched donors, while old mismatched donors were associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66) and relapse-free survival (HR 2.45). By contrast, in AML, survival did not differ by donor age; instead, disease biology dominated prognosis, with marrow blasts and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk strongly predicting outcomes. In conclusion, donor age interacts with donor type to shape allo-HSCT outcomes, with a marked impact in MDS but limited effect in AML. These findings suggest that old mismatched donors should be avoided in MDS and underscore the importance of disease-specific considerations in donor selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70303
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Donor age and type in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Strong effect in MDS , limited in AML

Ja Min Byun, Dong‐Yeop Shin, Y. Koh, Hyunsoo Cho et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Haematology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
article

Donor age and type in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Strong effect in MDS , limited in AML

Ja Min Byun, Dong‐Yeop Shin, Y. Koh, Hyunsoo Cho, Junshik Hong, Inho Kim, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Sin Young Park, Dong Hyun Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Donor age is an important factor influencing outcomes after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but its relevance across donor types and distinct disease biology in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains unclear. We analysed 320 patients with AML/MDS who underwent first allo-HSCT between 2016 and 2024. Donors were categorized as matched or mismatched and further stratified as young (<35 years) or old (≥35 years). Matched donors achieved superior survival compared with mismatched donors, while outcomes with young mismatched donors were intermediate and old mismatched donors were inferior driven by high non-relapse mortality. This effect was most evident in MDS, where young mismatched donors achieved survival similar to matched donors, while old mismatched donors were associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66) and relapse-free survival (HR 2.45). By contrast, in AML, survival did not differ by donor age; instead, disease biology dominated prognosis, with marrow blasts and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk strongly predicting outcomes. In conclusion, donor age interacts with donor type to shape allo-HSCT outcomes, with a marked impact in MDS but limited effect in AML. These findings suggest that old mismatched donors should be avoided in MDS and underscore the importance of disease-specific considerations in donor selection.

British Journal of Haematology
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.