Did the Bearing Surface Influence Outcome

Study Design: Retrieval analysis. Objective: To analyze a cohort of all retrieved XL-total disc replacements (XL-TDR) to investigate failure modes. Background: The XL-TDR was a lumbar metal-on-metal disc replacement that was withdrawn before clinical approval. Clinical reports have not indicated if early failures were attributed to the bearing surfaces or other design features. Materials and methods: All XL-TDRs (N = 20) received by an independent academic retrieval laboratory were evaluated using nondestructive techniques. Demographic information and reported causes of removal were documented. Light microscopy, metrology, and radiographic evaluation were conducted. Maximum linear wear and sphericity deviations from a fit sphere were calculated. Soft tissue histology was performed for cases with available tissue samples. Results: Suboptimal surgical placement was identified in 75% of cases. Loss of fixation was identified in 65% of cases, typically evidenced by migration or loosening. Accordingly, minimal bony attachment was seen on the porous-coated endplates, with most surfaces covered by loosely adhered fibrous tissue. Finally, impingement and heterotopic ossification (HO) were each observed in 65% and 60% of implants, respectively. Articular surfaces showed minimal wear, with only three specimens exhibiting deviations >25 µm from sphericity. No CoCr debris was detected in any of the examined tissues. Conclusion: Reliance on bony ongrowth for fixation and geometric constraint likely contributed to high rates of observed impingement, HO, and loss of fixation. CAD-based modeling further supported that limited flexion range and early anterior contact predisposed the device to impingement. These findings suggest that fixation strategy and implant geometry, rather than the bearing material, were likely the primary contributors to XL-TDR failure. These observations, combined with articular surface measurements, that is, low spherical deviations and tissue analysis, indicated that metal-on-metal bearing wear did not play a prominent role in these failures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine Open
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bn9.0000000000000028
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Did the Bearing Surface Influence Outcome

Sophia N. Sangiorgio, Eddie Ebramzadeh, Nicholas G Lamb, Sang-Hyun Park et al.
Spine Open
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Did the Bearing Surface Influence Outcome

Sophia N. Sangiorgio, Eddie Ebramzadeh, Nicholas G Lamb, Sang-Hyun Park, Jarod Carol
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Retrieval analysis. Objective: To analyze a cohort of all retrieved XL-total disc replacements (XL-TDR) to investigate failure modes. Background: The XL-TDR was a lumbar metal-on-metal disc replacement that was withdrawn before clinical approval. Clinical reports have not indicated if early failures were attributed to the bearing surfaces or other design features. Materials and methods: All XL-TDRs (N = 20) received by an independent academic retrieval laboratory were evaluated using nondestructive techniques. Demographic information and reported causes of removal were documented. Light microscopy, metrology, and radiographic evaluation were conducted. Maximum linear wear and sphericity deviations from a fit sphere were calculated. Soft tissue histology was performed for cases with available tissue samples. Results: Suboptimal surgical placement was identified in 75% of cases. Loss of fixation was identified in 65% of cases, typically evidenced by migration or loosening. Accordingly, minimal bony attachment was seen on the porous-coated endplates, with most surfaces covered by loosely adhered fibrous tissue. Finally, impingement and heterotopic ossification (HO) were each observed in 65% and 60% of implants, respectively. Articular surfaces showed minimal wear, with only three specimens exhibiting deviations >25 µm from sphericity. No CoCr debris was detected in any of the examined tissues. Conclusion: Reliance on bony ongrowth for fixation and geometric constraint likely contributed to high rates of observed impingement, HO, and loss of fixation. CAD-based modeling further supported that limited flexion range and early anterior contact predisposed the device to impingement. These findings suggest that fixation strategy and implant geometry, rather than the bearing material, were likely the primary contributors to XL-TDR failure. These observations, combined with articular surface measurements, that is, low spherical deviations and tissue analysis, indicated that metal-on-metal bearing wear did not play a prominent role in these failures.

Spine OpenVol. 2(1)
Oakland University (US), Orthopaedic Institute for Children (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.